1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Linear subspace proof

  1. Aug 17, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Let V and W be vector spaces over [itex]F [/itex] and [itex]T:V \rightarrow W[/itex] a linear transformation. Prove that [itex]ker(T):=[/itex]{[itex]\epsilon V\mid T()=0_{v}[/itex]} is a vector subspace of [itex]V[/itex]

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Is it allright just to state the trivial solution.

    ie There exists the vector [itex]0v\epsilon V[/itex] such that
    [itex]T(0v) \rightarrow W_{0}[/itex]

    therfore the vector [itex]0v\epsilon V [/itex] is also [itex]0v\epsilon T [/itex]

    or do I need more Axioms like

    There exists the vectors [itex]-v\epsilon V[/itex] and [itex]v\epsilon V[/itex] such that
    [itex]T(-v+v) = T(0v) \rightarrow W_{0}[/itex]

    to prove that T() is a vector subspace of V
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 17, 2009 #2
    You're trying to prove that ker(T) is a subspace, so you have to show that 0 is in ker(T). Moreover, you have to show that if u and v are in ker(T), then so is u + v. Finally, if u is in ker(T) and c is a scalar, then you have to show that c*u is in ker(T). These all follow directly from the basic properties of linear transformations.
  4. Aug 17, 2009 #3
    Thanks for your help.

    As a subspace always has the zero vector can I just say that for
    {u,v} both elemants of V.
    We have
    0v = A
    0u = B

    Ax= 0 and Ay = 0, then A(x + y) = vx + vy = 0 + 0 = 0

    Ax = 0 and c is a scalar, then A(cx) = cAx = c0 = 0

    {Ax ,Bu} = 0 and c is a scalar, then Acx+Bcy = cAx+cBy = c0 + c0 = 0+0 = 0

    Is that allright?

    Ax = 0 and c is a scalar, then A(cx) = cAx = c0 = 0
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Linear subspace proof