1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Linear transformation

  1. Apr 1, 2007 #1
    after a series of computations, I was able to get the following matrix equation from the given of a problem:

    [tex]\[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} W_1 \\ W_2 \end{array} \right)\] =
    \[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} \frac{\sigma_{11}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{11}^2 + \sigma_{12}^2}} & \frac{\sigma_{12}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{11}^2 + \sigma_{12}^2}} \\ \frac{\sigma_{21}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{21}^2 + \sigma_{22}^2}} & \frac{\sigma_{22}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{21}^2 + \sigma_{22}^2}}\end{array} \right)\] \[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} Y_1 \\ Y_2 \end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

    where Y1 and Y2 are independent processes.

    the correlation of W1 and W2 was given as follows:

    [tex]\rho = \frac{\sigma_{11}\sigma_{21} + \sigma_{12}\sigma_{22}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{11}^2 + \sigma_{12}^2}\sqrt{\sigma_{21}^2 + \sigma_{22}^2}}[/tex]

    Now what the problem asks is that I be able to show the following matrix equation to be true:

    [tex]\[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} W_1 \\ W_2 \end{array} \right)\] =
    \[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} 1 & 0 \\ \rho & \sqrt{1 - \rho^2} \end{array} \right)\] \[\left( \begin{array} {ccc} Z_1 \\ Z_2 \end{array} \right)\] [/tex]

    where Z1 and Z2 are independent
    and rho is the correlation of W1 and W2.

    My question is:
    can I just let
    [tex]\sigma_{11} = 1[/tex]
    [tex]\sigma_{12} = 0[/tex]

    and just let
    Y1 = Z1
    Y2 = Z2?

    cause if I did so, then the matrix equation that I want to prove is satisfied.
    that is, the following are now true:
    [tex]\rho = \frac{\sigma_{21}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{21}^2 + \sigma_{22}^2}}[/tex]
    [tex]\sqrt{1 - \rho^2} = \frac{\sigma_{22}}{\sqrt{\sigma_{21}^2 + \sigma_{22}^2}}[/tex]

    Is this a valid way of proving?

    or should I have to find a matrix linear transformation to transfrom the first equation that I got into the required equation? cause if that's the way that it shouldbe done, then I'm not sure how to proceed about it.

    thanks for the help.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 1, 2007 #2

    AKG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Let W denote the left side of this equation, let S denote the 2x2 matrix on the right side, and let Y denote what you think it denotes.
    Let R denote the 2x2 matrix on the right side of this equation, and let Z denote what you think it does.

    So you have W = SY and you want to show that if W = RZ, then the entries of Z are independent. You can't go setting [itex]\sigma _{ij}[/itex] and Zi to whatever you like. What kind of question would that be? Anyways, if you want to get W = RZ, then it's equivalent to get SY = RZ. In order to get this, what must Z be? Clearly, Z = R-1SY. So look at R-1SY, and show it's entires to be independent. Use the fact that the entries of Y are independent, and that the entries of W have correlation [itex]\rho[/itex].
     
  4. Apr 1, 2007 #3
    hi thanks for replying

    actually, what I need to show is that I can write W in the form RZ where Z are independent.
    that is, defining W, S, Y, R, and Z below, and given W = SY where Y are independent, I must show that I can write W as W = RZ where Z are independent.

    does what you have written still apply?
    thanks again.
     
  5. Apr 1, 2007 #4

    AKG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes. ,
     
  6. Apr 1, 2007 #5
    hi AKG,

    after thinking it throrughly, I think I understand what you meant.
    I only need to solve for Z = R^{-1}SY
    and then I show the elements of Z are independent of each other (possibly by showing that their covariance is 0)

    Thanks for you help! cheers!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Linear transformation
  1. Linear Transformation (Replies: 1)

  2. Linear transformations (Replies: 4)

  3. Linear transformation (Replies: 4)

  4. Linear transformation (Replies: 18)

Loading...