In this paper: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25170907?seq=1 the authors claim to show that linearity of the lorentz transformaiton follows from homogeneity of space and time. They consider two reference systems K and K' with coordinates (x,t) and (x',t') and write down the transformation laws as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$f(x',x,t) = 0; h(t',x,t) = 0.$$

They then say that homogeneity of space implies

$$f(x' + \epsilon, x + \epsilon,t) = 0; h(t', x+ \epsilon, t) = 0$$

which they say represent a translation of the origin, or equivalently the translation of the place at which an event occurs, and where ##\epsilon## is an arbitrary parameter of dimension length.

Now, is not this transformation assuming that if the event, according to K, originally placed at ##x## away from the origin, is moved to ##x + \epsilon##, then that same event, according to K', will be moved to ##x' + \epsilon##?

If so would not that contradict the fact that K and K' does not agree on lengths? It seems that if an event is moved by ##\epsilon## in K, then it should be moved by ##\epsilon'## in K' with (in general) ##\epsilon \neq \epsilon'##.

So are the authors making an erroneous assumption? Or where does my reasoning go wrong?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Linearity of Lorentz transformations from Homogeneity

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**