Linear independence of three vectors

In summary: Consider the vectors x, 2x, and 3x. I notice that for the equation ##c_1x + c_2*2x + c_3*3x = 0##, that ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0## is a solution. Can you conclude that these vectors are linearly independent?No, they are not linearly independent. No, they are not linearly independent.
  • #1
Salmone
101
13
If I've got three vectors ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent and ##\vec{c}## is linearly independent from ##\vec{a}##, is ##\vec{c}## also linearly independent from ##\vec{b}##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Salmone said:
If I've got three vectors ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent and ##\vec{c}## is linearly independent from ##\vec{a}##, is ##\vec{c}## also linearly independent from ##\vec{b}##?
You mean assuming ##\vec c \ne \vec b##?
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
  • #3
PeroK said:
You mean assuming ##\vec c \ne \vec b##?
Yes.
 
  • #4
Salmone said:
Yes.
Under what circumstances are two vectors linearly independent? There's a fairly simple criterion.
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
Under what circumstances are two vectors linearly independent? There's a fairly simple criterion.
If the linear combination of the two is equal to ##0## only when both coefficients are equal to ##0##.
 
  • #6
Salmone said:
Yes.
Can you use the ##\vec c = \vec b ## counterexample to think up a whole family of other counterexamples?
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #7
Salmone said:
If the linear combination of the two is equal to ##0## only when both coefficients are equal to ##0##.
Okay, but for only two vectors that implies something simple.
 
  • #8
Salmone said:
If I've got three vectors ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent and ##\vec{c}## is linearly independent from ##\vec{a}##, is ##\vec{c}## also linearly independent from ##\vec{b}##?

PeroK said:
Under what circumstances are two vectors linearly independent? There's a fairly simple criterion.

Salmone said:
If the linear combination of the two is equal to 0 only when both coefficients are equal to 0.
What does it mean geometrically if two vectors are linearly independent? I believe @PeroK is trying to get you to think in this direction.
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
  • #9
Mark44 said:
What does it mean geometrically if two vectors are linearly independent? I believe @PeroK is trying to get you to think in this direction.
They are orthogonal?
 
  • #10
Salmone said:
That they are orthogonal?
There's no such thing as "orthogonal" until you define an inner product on your vector space.

The answer is that ##\vec a## and ##\vec b## are linearly independent as long as one is not a scalar multiple of the other. The only vectors that are linearly dependent with ##\vec a## are vectors of the form ##\lambda \vec a## for some scalar ##\lambda##.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, FactChecker and Salmone
  • #11
Hi,@Salmone , a set of vectors ##\{\vec{u_1},\vec{u_2},\ldots{\vec{u_{k}}}\}## is linearly independent ##\Longleftrightarrow{\lambda_{1}\vec{u_1}+\lambda_{2}\vec{u_2}+\ldots{+\lambda_{k}\vec{u_{k}}}=\vec{0}}##, then ##\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\ldots{=\lambda_{k}=0}##,...Hmm, I think I'm late, :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
PeroK said:
There's no such thing as "orthogonal" until you define an inner product on your vector space.

The answer is that ##\vec a## and ##\vec b## are linearly independent as long as one is not a scalar multiple of the other. The only vectors that are linearly dependent with ##\vec a## are vectors of the form ##\lambda \vec a## for some scalar ##\lambda##.
Okay, so can we say the same for more than three vectors. For example vectors ##\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}## are linearly independent and a fourth vector ##\vec{d}## is linearly independent to ##\vec{a}## then it is linearly independent to ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## if ##\vec{d} \neq \vec{b} \neq \vec{c}##
 
  • #13
Salmone said:
Okay, so can we say the same for more than three vectors. For example vectors ##\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}## are linearly independent and a fourth vector ##\vec{d}## is linearly independent to ##\vec{a}## then it is linearly independent to ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## if ##\vec{d} \neq \vec{b} \neq \vec{c}##
It doesn't matter how many vectors you have. Linear independence between any pair of vectors is a simple matter or not being mutiples of each other.

It's only when you get to three or more vectors that linear independence becomes non-trivial.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Salmone
  • #14
PeroK said:
It doesn't matter how many vectors you have. Linear independence between any pair of vectors is a simple matter or not being mutiples of each other.

It's only when you get to three or more vectors that linear independence becomes non-trivial.
So it's yes? If a vector is linearly independent on another vector and this last one is LI to another vector and so on, they are all LI?
 
  • #15
Salmone said:
So it's yes? If a vector is linearly independent on another vector and this last one is LI to another vector and so on, they are all LI?
Definitely not.
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
Definitely not.
So I can't understand your previous answer "It doesn't matter how many vectors you have."
 
  • #17
mcastillo356 said:
Hi,@Salmone , a set of vectors ##\{\vec{u_1},\vec{u_2},\ldots{\vec{u_{k}}}\}## is linearly independent ##\Longleftrightarrow{\lambda_{1}\vec{u_1}+\lambda_{2}\vec{u_2}+\ldots{+\lambda_{k}\vec{u_{k}}}=\vec{0}}##, then ##\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\ldots{=\lambda_{k}=0}##,...Hmm, I think I'm late, :smile:
That's not quite right. That set of vectors is linearly independent iff the only solution to the equation ##c_1x_1 + c_2x_2 + \dots + c_nx_n = 0## is ##c_1 = c_2 = \dots = c_n = 0##

Consider the vectors x, 2x, and 3x. I notice that for the equation ##c_1x + c_2*2x + c_3*3x = 0##, that ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0## is a solution. Can you conclude that these vectors are linearly independent?
 
  • Love
Likes mcastillo356
  • #18
Salmone said:
So it's yes? If a vector is linearly independent on another vector and this last one is LI to another vector and so on, they are all LI?
No. Draw a picture to see why the above isn't true.

What @PeroK was saying is that it's easy to determine whether two vectors are dependent. If they are, they either point the same direction or in opposite directions. I.e., they are either parallel or antiparallel (point in opposite directions). That's what "scalar multiples" of one another means.

If you have three or more vectors it's harder to tell whether they are linearly dependent or linearly independent.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Salmone
  • #19
Mark44 said:
No. Draw a picture to see why the above isn't true.

What @PeroK was saying is that it's easy to determine whether two vectors are dependent. If they are, they either point the same direction or in opposite directions. I.e., they are either parallel or antiparallel (point in opposite directions). That's what "scalar multiples" of one another means.

If you have three or more vectors it's harder to tell whether they are linearly dependent or linearly independent.
Ok and so what is the answer to my first question? Now I'm way more confused.
 
  • #20
Salmone said:
Ok and so what is the answer to my first question? Now I'm way more confused.
We're not going to just tell you the answer, but we'll help you arrive at it. If you draw a picture of three vectors, you'll probably get the answer in short order.
 
  • #21
Mark44 said:
We're not going to just tell you the answer, but we'll help you arrive at it. If you draw a picture of three vectors, you'll probably get the answer in short order.
I drew the three vectors and have no idea what I am supposed to figure out from this.
 
  • #22
You have said that if ##\vec c = \vec b##, then it is not true. In fact, if ##\vec c## is a multiple of ##\vec b##, then it is not true (if this is not clear to you, then you should prove it). In fact, what can you say if ##\vec c## has even a tiny component that is a multiple of ##\vec b##? So what should the answer to the problem be?
 
  • #23
FactChecker said:
You have said that if ##\vec c = \vec b##, then it is not true. In fact, if ##\vec c## is a multiple of ##\vec b##, then it is not true (if this is not clear to you, then you should prove it). In fact, what can you say if ##\vec c## has even a tiny component that is a multiple of ##\vec b##? So what should the answer to the problem be?
If ##\vec{c}## has a tiny component that is a multiple of ##\vec{b}## they are linearly indipendent.
 
  • #24
Mark44 said:
We're not going to just tell you the answer, but we'll help you arrive at it. If you draw a picture of three vectors, you'll probably get the answer in short order.
What I can imagine is that: if ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent then they are not a multiple of each other and if ##\vec{c}## is linearly independent with ##\vec{a}## the same can be said of these two BUT, since ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{b}## are different they cannot even be multiples of each other so the answer should be yes, right?
 
  • #25
Due to an error on one poster's part, I have deleted that post as well as another post that pointed out the error.
 
  • Like
Likes Haborix and FactChecker
  • #26
Salmone said:
I drew the three vectors and have no idea what I am supposed to figure out from this.
Can you post the picture you drew?
 
  • #27
Salmone said:
What I can imagine is that: if ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent then they are not a multiple of each other and if ##\vec{c}## is linearly independent with ##\vec{a}## the same can be said of these two BUT, since ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{b}## are different they cannot even be multiples of each other so the answer should be yes, right?
Your argument is similar to:
  1. 5 is not a multiple of 2
  2. 5 is not a multiple of 4
  3. 4 isn't equal to 2; therefore, 4 is not a multiple of 2.
See the problem?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and mfb
  • #28
Hi, PF, this is hardwork!:biggrin:(for me, of course)
##\{(0,0,1),(0,0,2),(0,0,3)\}## is dependent, though could be multyplied by ##\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda_3=0## to be ##\vec{0}##
Thanks, @Mark44 !
Where I wrote "then", it is ##\iff##
Quite sure:smile:
 
  • #29
vela said:
Your argument is similar to:
  1. 5 is not a multiple of 2
  2. 5 is not a multiple of 4
  3. 4 isn't equal to 2; therefore, 4 is not a multiple of 2.
See the problem?
No, ##5*2/5=2## so they are the same vector, ##2/5## is a scalar. If ##\vec{a}## doesn't the same direction of ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{c}## doesn't have the same direction of ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{c} \neq \vec{b}##, how can ##\vec{c}## and ##\vec{b}## have the same direction?
 
  • #30
Mark44 said:
Can you post the picture you drew?
media_3aa_3aa3ee1f-e593-4eca-97a3-861e72759640_phpvKKeK6.png

It seems to me that three vectors like these are linearly independent
 
  • #31
Salmone said:
View attachment 301867
It seems to me that three vectors like these are linearly independent
Note that for three vectors linear independence is a test of all three vectors. It cannot be reduced to a test for each pair of vectors.

In your diagram, any of the three vectors can be expressed as a sum of the other two. So, they are linearly dependent. You can have at most two linearly independent vectors in ##\mathbb R^2##.

It's not a question of linear independence of any two vectors. It's a question of all three vectors taken together.
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
  • #32
PeroK said:
Note that for three vectors linear independence is a test of all three vectors. It cannot be reduced to a test for each pair of vectors.

In your diagram, any of the three vectors can be expressed as a sum of the other two. So, they are linearly dependent. You can have at most two linearly independent vectors in ##\mathbb R^2##.

It's not a question of linear independence of any two vectors. It's a question of all three vectors taken together.
Ok so in general the answer to my first question is no, if I have 3 or more vectors I can't check their linearly independence just looking at 2 vectors per time, I need to check the whole independence.
 
  • #33
Salmone said:
Ok so in general the answer to my first question is no, if I have 3 or more vectors I can't check their linearly independence just looking at 2 vectors per time, I need to check the whole independence.
Precisely.

Note that unless two vectors are "in the same direction", i.e. "essentially the same vector", then they are always linearly independent.
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
  • #34
PeroK said:
Precisely.

Note that unless two vectors are "in the same direction", i.e. "essentially the same vector", then they are always linearly independent.
So the same can be said about a basis, a basis is the set made of the maximum number of linearly independent vectors, let's say ##B={\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}}##. This means that no vectors linearly independent with the vectors of the set can be left out of the set, but a single vector ##\vec{d}##, for example linearly independent only with ##\vec{a}##, doesn't need to be in the set since the linear independence must be among all the vectors in the set and for sure the vectors of the vectorial space outside the basis will be "not on the same direction" of the single vectors inside the basis, otherwise the whole vectorial space would consist of only the vectors of the basis. Hope the question is clear.
 
  • #35
They are linearly independent in any possible pair, but not as triplet.

How do I know that without trying to applying the definition of linear independence and see where i get?

Well, there are some theorems governing linear independence. One of those theorems say that if the dimension of a vector space is n, then any ##N>n## vectors of the vector space are linearly dependent. Now also another theorem says that the dimension of the vector space that has all the vectors of an euclidean plane is 2. Here we have 3>2 vectors of the plane so I guess you understand how the theorems apply here.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
<h2>What is linear independence of three vectors?</h2><p>Linear independence of three vectors refers to the property of three vectors in a vector space being able to span the entire vector space without any redundancy or overlap. This means that no vector can be written as a linear combination of the other two vectors.</p><h2>Why is linear independence important?</h2><p>Linear independence is important because it allows us to easily solve systems of equations and perform other mathematical operations on vectors. It also helps us to understand the structure and behavior of vector spaces.</p><h2>How do you determine if three vectors are linearly independent?</h2><p>To determine if three vectors are linearly independent, you can set up a system of equations and use row reduction techniques to see if there is a unique solution. If there is a unique solution, then the vectors are linearly independent. Another method is to calculate the determinant of the matrix formed by the three vectors. If the determinant is non-zero, then the vectors are linearly independent.</p><h2>Can three vectors in a vector space be linearly independent if one of them is a multiple of another?</h2><p>No, if one vector is a multiple of another, then it is not possible for the three vectors to be linearly independent. This is because the third vector can be written as a linear combination of the other two, making it redundant and not contributing to the span of the vector space.</p><h2>What is the relationship between linear independence and linear dependence?</h2><p>Linear independence and linear dependence are opposite concepts. If three vectors are linearly independent, then they are not linearly dependent on each other. On the other hand, if three vectors are linearly dependent, then they are not linearly independent. In other words, linear independence and linear dependence are mutually exclusive properties of three vectors in a vector space.</p>

What is linear independence of three vectors?

Linear independence of three vectors refers to the property of three vectors in a vector space being able to span the entire vector space without any redundancy or overlap. This means that no vector can be written as a linear combination of the other two vectors.

Why is linear independence important?

Linear independence is important because it allows us to easily solve systems of equations and perform other mathematical operations on vectors. It also helps us to understand the structure and behavior of vector spaces.

How do you determine if three vectors are linearly independent?

To determine if three vectors are linearly independent, you can set up a system of equations and use row reduction techniques to see if there is a unique solution. If there is a unique solution, then the vectors are linearly independent. Another method is to calculate the determinant of the matrix formed by the three vectors. If the determinant is non-zero, then the vectors are linearly independent.

Can three vectors in a vector space be linearly independent if one of them is a multiple of another?

No, if one vector is a multiple of another, then it is not possible for the three vectors to be linearly independent. This is because the third vector can be written as a linear combination of the other two, making it redundant and not contributing to the span of the vector space.

What is the relationship between linear independence and linear dependence?

Linear independence and linear dependence are opposite concepts. If three vectors are linearly independent, then they are not linearly dependent on each other. On the other hand, if three vectors are linearly dependent, then they are not linearly independent. In other words, linear independence and linear dependence are mutually exclusive properties of three vectors in a vector space.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
458
Replies
8
Views
965
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
647
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • General Math
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
996
Replies
2
Views
170
Back
Top