Having a hard time understanding this example from a book:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The function f(x) = 1/x is locally bounded at each point x in the set E = (0,1).

Let x \in (0,1). Take \delta_x = x/2, M_x = 2/x. Then

f(t) = 1/t <= 2/x = M_x

if

x/2 = x-\delta_x < t < x + \delta_x

This argument is false since the point 0 is an accumulation point that does not belong to (0,1). As such there is no assumption that 0 is bounded. This can be avoided by making E closed.

I don't understand this last part. Why does it matter that 0 is not bounded? I thought the whole point of locally bounded is that we can define the bound in terms of x. And we can always find a small enough interval (namely x/2) that will not include 0.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

Thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Locally bounded argument

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**