Logic in the climate change discussion

  1. Jan 25, 2005 #1
    I'm not sure if this is correct spot for analysing the logic in the climate change discussion. But it's about logic and not about global warming. So we give it a shot.

    Let's meet Stephen Schneider

    I will not comment here, that would be risking poisoning the well. Only notice that SS is a scientist in the field of climate change.

    Now perhaps check out his homepage, a narration about climate change. Let's focus on the page Contrarians

    Now I do wonder if we see either a skillfull logical refuting of the opponents or the most dense concentration of fallacies per sentence ever.

    What would it be?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 25, 2005 #2
    And yes, you're right: This is a black-or-white fallacy:
    See how easy it is to generate inproper thinking? Grey is also allowed.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Logic in the climate change discussion
  1. Climate crime (Replies: 0)

  2. The logic (Replies: 1)