If Y~N(mu,sigma) and y=logX, with X~LN(mu,sigma),(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

with a*=exp{ybar+1/2*theta*sample variance of y}, where ybar=sample mean of y and a=E[X]=exp{mu+1/2*sigma^2}, theta is constant.

If theta=1, a* is consistent but biased and we can reduce the bias by choosing a different value of theta. Use a large n-approximation in the expression E[a*] to find a value that reduces the bias, as compared to when theta=1.

During my attempt to do this, I ended up with E[a*]=E[geometric mean of x * geometric variance of x]. Knowing that y=logx and thus ybar=log(x1*x2*...*xn)/n, I ended with such an expression. I have a feeling that this is most likely incorrect and am thus completely lost. I was thinking along the lines of possibly using CLT or Weak Law of Large Numbers, with the n-approximation detail in the question, but still don't know where to go from there.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# LogNormal Mean Estimators

Loading...

Similar Threads for LogNormal Mean Estimators |
---|

Unbiased estimate of a parameter in the Rice distribution |

I How to plot a scaled lognormal function |

A Error estimation in linear regression |

I Why is the maximum likelihood estimation accurate? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**