I would like to ask for some guidance concerning this effect. So far I read the article in wiki and what is written about it in the cms page.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As an overall, taking the "definition" from the paper cited by the cms page, "When searching for a new resonance somewhere in a possible mass range, the significance of observing a local excess of events must take into account the probability of observing such an excess anywhere in the range."

However I am not sure I understand how is that possible? obviously in the data someone takes, there will be regions without a significant signal, and maybe regions with a significant signal. For example the [itex]m_{ee}[/itex] for the [itex]Z\rightarrow ee[/itex] will show a peak at ~91 GeV with a width of ~2GeV. Is there any trial factor considered in this Z example? (of course if we say that there isn't, I don't see a reason for such a trial factor to play a role in Z' searches).

One difference is that the LEE appears (let me rephrase it) "when we don't know where our signal is supposed to be". But wasn't that true for all our searches? At first we never knew where a signal was supposed to be, and then we do know..we didn't know that the Higgs was at 126GeV, yet now we do...So I am getting a little confused with when a LEE takes place and when it doesn't.

One additional "problem" I have is that I don't understand how searches (trials) that have not been published affect the data taken from the detector. My problem is that I don't find the connection between the older to the newer analysis... If today I measure 100 events at mass 1TeV, and I don't publish it, how can this lead you in measuring 1000events at 1TeV the next day?

Thanks.

PS. I know this concerns mostly particle physics, but I think the effect itself is a statistical one, that's why I chose this sector to post.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Look Elsewhere Effect

Loading...

Similar Threads - Elsewhere Effect | Date |
---|---|

A Indirect effect and spuriousity | Nov 17, 2017 |

A Factoring (Possible) Effect of Dunning-Kruger. | Feb 21, 2017 |

I Effect of a Moving Average on Gaussian Noise | Aug 9, 2016 |

I Most effective of 1000 groups given mean median mode and N | Apr 25, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**