- #1
- 10
- 0
I'm trying to look for papers with funny abstracts (in particular, there is one I saw a while ago, I believe it was physics, that had an abstract that only said no which I am trying to find, but I would love to see other funny one as well.)
PAllen said:Eva Silverstein can't be left out (titles):
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0756
http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4521
http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.5403
http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1061
http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3922 (now if only she could write a paper on P-branes)
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506130
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502021
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403001
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9709209
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9503150
Ygggdrasil said:Chemistry journals often publish graphical abstracts accompanying the actual text of the abstract. Sometimes these images have unintended meanings:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ic0352250
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl802977m
This one suffers from an unfortunate choice of acronym for copper nanotubes (see the image):
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2007/CC/b614147a
PoyDuo said:I'm trying to look for papers with funny abstracts (in particular, there is one I saw a while ago, I believe it was physics, that had an abstract that only said no which I am trying to find, but I would love to see other funny one as well.)