Loren Booda: Interpretations of QM?

In summary, the conversation discusses the role of the observer in quantum mechanics and how the act of measurement affects the state of the system. The speaker also suggests that the observer may act as a repository for the missing complement to the quantum object, but this idea is debatable. The concept of wavefunction collapse is also mentioned, with some interpretations not involving it at all.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
My personal, "observer-object" interpretation (Configuration Complementarity at www.quantumdream.net[/URL]):

[quote]Quantum measurement yields an object state, with the simultaneous complementary state traditionally remaining in complex Hilbert space. Customary complementary pairs separate orthogonally there. The "observer-object," however, associates one complement with observation, and the other with observation inverted through its accompanying phase space. [i]Of the many quantum interpretations, none seems to suggest that the process of complementarity may unfold exclusively in relatively real, accessible phase space. Here the observer provides herself as the repository for the missing complement to the quantum object.[/i]

We measure directly the momentum of the quantum object, only to react with an uncertainty of displacement upon our immediate personal perception. As momentum complements position, an observer's state complements that of her quantum object. What better place but in the observer for the complement alternate to that selected by measurement, occasionally corresponding macroscopic to microscopic? Upon measuring directly a displacement of Planck length L*, the measurer would receive a momentum reaction equal to h/L*, or 4,000,000 gm-cm/sec, beyond the kick of a mule. Normally, though, the observer does not appreciate the physical sensation of complementarity.

A complex Hilbert space complement state correlates now to the real phase space observer state. This retains a dynamic role for the observer and reduces the complexity needed to describe the state of the system. A compatible measurement retains the observer-object status quo, while a complementary measurement interchanges by photon action their observables in real phase space. With wavefunction collapse (projection from complex Hilbert space) now compensated, the observer-object system becomes determinably classical.

The observer has always occupied a participatory role in quantum mechanics and cosmology. The "observer-object" classicizes its traditionally distinct entities by treating them much like an observer and the cosmos she occupies. We objectify ourselves in this regard as a holistic classical system. One might think that by including the observer, physics would get more subjective. [i]If we [u]exclude[/u] ourselves from our own observation we actually [u]subjectify[/u] our experiment.[/i][/quote]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello, thank you for sharing your personal interpretation of quantum mechanics. It is always interesting to hear different perspectives on this complex and fascinating topic. I would like to offer some thoughts and comments on your interpretation.

Firstly, I agree that the observer plays a crucial role in quantum mechanics. The act of measurement itself alters the state of the system, and it is the observer who determines which observable is being measured. However, I do not believe that the observer necessarily becomes the "repository" for the missing complement to the quantum object. While it is true that the observer's state may complement that of the observed quantum object, I do not think this means that the observer is somehow storing the missing state. Rather, the observer's state is simply a result of the measurement process.

Additionally, I am not sure I fully understand your statement about the observer not appreciating the physical sensation of complementarity. Could you clarify what you mean by this?

I also have some concerns about the idea of wavefunction collapse being compensated by the observer's state. While it is true that the observer's measurement affects the state of the system, the concept of wavefunction collapse is still a debated topic in quantum mechanics. Some interpretations do not involve wavefunction collapse at all, such as the Many-Worlds interpretation.

Overall, I appreciate your attempt to simplify and clarify the role of the observer in quantum mechanics. However, I would caution against making definitive statements about the nature of the observer and the measurement process, as it is still an ongoing area of research and debate in physics. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and perspective.
 

1. What is Loren Booda's interpretation of quantum mechanics?

Loren Booda's interpretation of quantum mechanics is known as the "transactional interpretation." It suggests that quantum particles are in a constant state of communication, with both past and future versions of themselves, and that all interactions involve a "transaction" between them.

2. How does Booda's interpretation differ from other interpretations of QM?

Booda's interpretation is unique in its emphasis on the transactional nature of quantum interactions. It also differs from other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, in its rejection of the collapse of the wave function and its consideration of both the past and future states of particles.

3. What evidence supports Booda's interpretation of QM?

Booda's interpretation is still a subject of debate and does not have widespread acceptance in the scientific community. However, some evidence that has been used to support it includes its ability to explain the phenomenon of quantum entanglement and its consistency with experimental results.

4. What are the criticisms against Booda's interpretation of QM?

One of the main criticisms against Booda's interpretation is that it is not falsifiable, meaning it cannot be proven or disproven through experimentation. It also has been criticized for being overly complex and not providing a clear explanation of certain phenomena, such as measurement in quantum mechanics.

5. How has Booda's interpretation influenced the field of quantum mechanics?

Booda's interpretation has sparked discussions and debates within the field of quantum mechanics, contributing to a deeper understanding of the principles and implications of this complex theory. It has also inspired further research and investigations into the transactional nature of quantum interactions.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
767
  • Classical Physics
Replies
13
Views
836
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
23
Views
655
Back
Top