Learning Lorentz Derivation: Solving x=vt+γx' vs. x=vt+x'/γ

In summary: I'm not following. Can you explain what this is?In summary, you seem to have been confused by the pictures in the previous thread and the Wiki article, and you made a mistake in your derivation.
  • #36
jeremyfiennes said:
A clock Xb, stationary in B, could be synchronized in the same way. Synchronization being an instantaneous procedure, velocities are irrelevant.

No, it is not. If the third is stationary in A's frame, then it CAN'T be synchronized with B's clock.

The present question is however the B coordinates of an event stationary in A.

An "event" is a single point in space and time. It's not stationary in any frame, because it's not an object.

Anyway, I've tried to explain to you how to compute ##t'## in terms of ##t##. Here's a picture of the situation:

rel2.jpg


The event with coordinates ##(x,t)## in frame A is the event that would take place at the end of a stick of length ##x## held out by A, and on the end of that stick is a clock, synchronized with A's clock, showing time ##t##. The same event has coordinates ##(x',t')## in frame B, which would be an event that would take place on a stick of length ##x'## held out by B, on the end of which is a clock showing time ##t'##. We arrange it so that when B's clock shows time ##t'##, A's clock shows time ##t##, and they are right beside each other. So ##(x,t)## and ##(x',t')## are two different coordinates describing the same event.

Shown from the point of view of A's frame, we can reason as follows:
  1. The distance between B and his remote clock is ##x'## in his own frame.
  2. The distance between A and his remote clock is ##x-vt##.
  3. Because B's stick is length-contracted, we have: ##x-vt = x'/\gamma##
  4. In A's frame, his remote clock is synchronized with his personal clock, right next to him. So they both show time ##t##
  5. In A's frame, B's personal clock shows time ##t_1' = t/\gamma##, because B's clock is running slower than A's by a factor of ##\gamma##
  6. In A's frame, B's remote clock shows time ##t' = t_1' + \Delta t'##, where ##\Delta t'## is the offset of B's remote clock, relative to B's personal clock.
So we have the following relationship between A's coordinates ##(x,t)## and B's coordinates ##(x', t')##:

##x' = \gamma (x-vt)##
##t' = t_1' + \Delta t' = t/\gamma + \Delta t'##

So we have our transformation, except that we need to compute ##\Delta t'##, the offset, as measured in A's frame, between B's remote clock and B's personal clock.

I already went through how to compute ##\Delta t'##. There is only one choice that is consistent with light having speed ##c## in B's frame:

##\Delta t' = - \frac{v x'}{c^2} = -\gamma \frac{v (x - vt)}{c^2}##

With that choice, B will measure time ##x'/c## for light to travel from him to the remote clock, and time ##x'/c## for it to travel back.
 

Attachments

  • rel2.jpg
    rel2.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 216
  • rel2.jpg
    rel2.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 264
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
stevendaryl said:
No, it is not. If the third is stationary in A's frame, then it CAN'T be synchronized with B's clock.
Not with you. A synchronizing signal sent from frame A (x/2,0) synchronises all three clocks - A and B at their here coincident origins, and X at frame A x.
 
  • #38
stevendaryl said:
An "event" is a single point in space and time. It's not stationary in any frame, because it's not an object.
Agreed. But it is here defined in terms of its frame A location x, rather than the corresponding frame B x'.
 
  • #39
Closed for moderation.
It will reopen later today
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
597
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top