Lorentz invariants

  • Thread starter QuArK21343
  • Start date
  • #1
47
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Why is it that charge is Lorentz invariant (it's a scalar, independent of the frame of reference) whereas mass is not? Does this mean that the gravitational force a body exerts depends on the frame of reference, whereas the electric force doesn't?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
194
The mass of a particle is also a Lorentz invariant. You may be thinking of the relativistic mass γm.
 
  • #3
47
0
Ok, since this is new to me, could you clarify the difference between the two? Do you mean the rest mass is Lorentz invariant? Anyway, there is no analogue to relativistic mass as far as charge is concerned (no relativistic charge), right?
 
  • #4
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
194
"Relativistic mass" is a highly misleading concept and should be avoided. Its use arose simply because the relativistic expression for the momentum happens to be p = γmv, and in trying to make look like the nonrelativistic formula it was written p = Mv where M = γm.

The Lorentz force equation can be written (τ is proper time)

dp/dτ = γe(E + v/c x B)

and sure enough there's the combination γe, but I would not recommend defining this as the "relativistic charge" either!
 

Related Threads on Lorentz invariants

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
948
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Top