Lorentz via rotation

  • #1
762
15
To me the easiest way to arrive at the Lorentz transformation is by rotation, using one dimension for space and the other for the product of time, the speed of light and the square root of minus one. This seems justifiable to me if one starts with the premise that ds^2 =ds'^2. I can see how if one assumes that the speed of light is the same in both frames of reference then ds^2=0 implies ds'^2=0 (and vice versa). But I don't know why ds^2=ds'^2 in general. Must one find the Lorentz transformation in some other way in order to arrive at this equality?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,000
5
To me the easiest way to arrive at the Lorentz transformation is by rotation, using one dimension for space and the other for the product of time, the speed of light and the square root of minus one. This seems justifiable to me if one starts with the premise that ds^2 =ds'^2. I can see how if one assumes that the speed of light is the same in both frames of reference then ds^2=0 implies ds'^2=0 (and vice versa). But I don't know why ds^2=ds'^2 in general. Must one find the Lorentz transformation in some other way in order to arrive at this equality?
Whatever works easiest for you!
But notice that this only works for flat spacetimes.
 
  • #3
pam
458
1
ict was popular 100 years ago. It has lost fashion, because it can't be extended to GR, and it complicates relativistic QM, with two different i's.
 
  • #4
762
15
Thanks to you both. I didn't realize that ict wouldn't work for non-flat spacetimes, but I guess it would yield a complex ds^2 (and who wants that?).
 

Related Threads on Lorentz via rotation

Replies
3
Views
448
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
820
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
461
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top