LSZ Representation: A Simple Explanation

In summary, the LSZ representation in quantum field theory is a way of identifying which eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are relevant for a given interaction. This is done by looking for asymptotically localized solutions of the theory. The masses of the particles are the poles of the propagators for this representation, and the spin of the particles is the number of degrees of freedom of the propagator.
  • #1
Itzhak the cat
2
0
I am looking for simple explanation for the idea of LSZ representation in quantum fields theory.
thanks in advance :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know what you mean by "representation",but I'm sure there's no simple explanation of this issue.Heavy mathematics is needed.

I infer you to chapters 13 & 14 from Bogolubov's book [1] for a serious treatment.

Daniel.

[1]N.N.Bogolubov et al.,"Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory",Benjamin/Cummings,1975.
 
  • #3
dextercioby said:
I don't know what you mean by "representation",but I'm sure there's no simple explanation of this issue.Heavy mathematics is needed.

I infer you to chapters 13 & 14 from Bogolubov's book [1] for a serious treatment.

Daniel.

[1]N.N.Bogolubov et al.,"Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory",Benjamin/Cummings,1975.

Let me try this coarse overview. Corrections always welcome.

First of all interactive quantum field theory is not well-defined. It has as many Hilbert spaces as there are points on a line, which is not physically meaningful. This is Haag's theorem. This problem shows up as a shaky vacuum state condition for interactive QFT; field states that should be over and gone continue to affect the vacuum. The LSZ formalism intends to work around this by going into the remote past and seeking "asymptotically localized" solutions of the theory. These will than be used as the incoming particles to the intreractions defined, e.g., by Feynman diagrams. As Daniel said, the math of doing this is very non-trivial, and Bogoliubov's book is a good intro to it. See also R. Haag, Local Quantum Physics, p. 81 ff.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Finding the spectrum.

selfAdjoint said:
Let me try this coarse overview. Corrections always welcome.

First of all interactive quantum field theory is not well-defined. It has as many Hilbert spaces as there are points on a line, which is not physically meaningful. This is Haag's theorem. This problem shows up as a shaky vacuum state condition for interactive QFT; field states that should be over and gone continue to affect the vacuum. The LSZ formalism intends to work around this by going into the remote past and seeking "asymptotically localized" solutions of the theory. These will than be used as the incoming particles to the intreractions defined, e.g., by Feynman diagrams. As Daniel said, the math of doing this is very non-trivial, and Bogoliubov's book is a good intro to it. See also R. Haag, Local Quantum Physics, p. 81 ff.

This is the reduction formalism. I am more interested in the spectrum- why the masses are the poles of the propagator, and why the spin is the number of degrees of freedom of the propagator?
I more or less understand the technique, using Poincare eigenstates, but sometimes (many times ) I can follow the math but miss the basic ideas.
 
  • #5
Itzhak the cat said:
This is the reduction formalism. I am more interested in the spectrum- why the masses are the poles of the propagator

The masses are the poles of the propagators because in free field theory, this is the case. We somehow want to consider our particles "free" in the far past and future. Of course they aren't, really, and there are serious problems in doing so. But even if interacting field theory is not free field theory, "it plays free field theory on TV, early in the morning, and late in the evening" :smile: And so you try to identify what aspects of the interacting theory mimick a free field theory: the pole of the propagator (the full, interacting one) looks a lot like the pole of a free field theory propagator ; so that pole is then identified as the mass. At least that's how I understand this correspondence.

cheers,
Patrick.
 
  • #6
The relationship between poles and bound states and resonances goes back to basic scattering theory, as in the Lippman Schwinger Eq.. In fact, scattering theory is usually expressed with Green's Function based solutions. (For all practical purposes, the LSZ formalism is like a covariant form of scattering theory. Horrible things that can happen to make the asymptotic limits of the S-Matrix suspect are all over the place -- unbounded operators, and stuff like that. This is great grist for those that work in formal field theory. Then there are the highly practical ones, who can show that the use of wave packets rather than plane waves cures many evils.)

Suppose that |W> = |W0> + (1/(E-H0))*V*|W>, where H0 is the unperturbed hamiltonian, V is the interaction so, that H = H0 + V. |W0> is an eigenstate of H0. This eq. is not much help with bound states, so we use a formal solution,

|W> = (1 - (1/((E-H))*V) |W0>. Thus, there are poles at the bound states, E<0, of H, and a branch point at E = 0 (How's that again?) Weinberg's Vol 1 does LSZ, an older book by Goldberger and Watson, Scattering Theory does wave packets, Lippman Schwinger and formal scattering theory, and poles and branch cuts (dispersion relations), and you name it -- it's a superb book.) (Greens functions are sometimes called resolvants by mathematicians. There's a huge literature on this subject usually under the general field of Functional Analysis.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

What is LSZ representation?

LSZ representation is a mathematical framework used in quantum field theory to calculate the scattering amplitudes of particles.

Why is LSZ representation important?

LSZ representation allows for the calculation of scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory, which is necessary in order to make predictions about the behavior of particles in high-energy collisions.

How does LSZ representation work?

LSZ representation uses a mathematical technique called "operator product expansion" to express correlation functions in terms of the interactions between particles.

What are the limitations of LSZ representation?

LSZ representation is limited to perturbative calculations, meaning it can only be used to calculate the behavior of particles in weak interactions rather than strong interactions.

Can LSZ representation be applied to other fields of physics?

Yes, LSZ representation has been applied to other areas of physics such as condensed matter physics and statistical mechanics, where it is used to calculate correlation functions and transport coefficients.

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
730
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
862
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
807
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
747
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
909
Back
Top