1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Magnetic Field and Work

  1. Apr 3, 2008 #1
    How does a magnetic field do work on the electrons in a wire?

    If F = q v x B, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to the velocity of the free charge. After a small time interval, dx = v dt, so that v and x are in the same direction.

    For the magnetic field to do work on the charge, dW = F dot dx. But F and dx are perpendicular, aren't they?, so no work seems to be done.
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 3, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    That's right. Magnetic forces never do any work.
  4. Apr 3, 2008 #3


    User Avatar

    A time varying magnetic field will lead to an electric field that does work.
    An example is Faraday's law.
  5. Apr 3, 2008 #4
    An electric generator does work because the field changes?
  6. Apr 4, 2008 #5


    User Avatar

    A magnetic field acting on a permanent or electric magnetic can do work.
  7. Apr 4, 2008 #6


    User Avatar

    That is how an induction motor works.
    Other motors use a permanent or electric magnet as an armature,
    and a magnetic field does do work on the armature.
  8. Apr 5, 2008 #7
    Pam, thank you for answering.

    You threw me so far. I am now sure you are applying Faraday's law in integral form,
    [tex]\int _{_\partial S} \overline{E} ds = -\int _{S} \partial_{t}\overline{B}dxdy[/tex] ,
    it must surely be.

    This makes some very good sense.

    I could not possibly see how to apply Faraday's law in differential form,

    [tex]\nabla\times \overline{E} = -\partial_{t}\overline{B}[/tex].

    Unfortunately, I still cannot.

    In the vicinity of the wire B is unchanging, we should presume. In such a manner [tex]\partial_{t}\overline{B}[/tex] should be zero as well, in this locally manner. But should this not make [tex]\nabla \times \overline{E}[/tex] zero as well?

    Something I am missing.
  9. Apr 5, 2008 #8
    Can this be understood in terms of a field that doesn't act at a distance?

    Does a locally acting 4-vector potential, A and Dirac's equation of A acting on the phase of the free electrons in a conductor make some sense of it?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook