Magnetic Field Lines: Proving c(T)=c(0) with T≠0

In summary, the question is what assumptions must be made about the function B in order to prove that the curve described by c will return to its starting point with some non-zero value of T.
  • #1
jostpuur
2,116
19
Suppose that a function [itex]B:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] and [itex]c:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] are defined such that [itex]c[/itex] is differentiable, and

[tex]
\dot{c}(t) = B(c(t))
[/tex]

for all [itex]t[/itex]. The question is that what must be assumed of [itex]B[/itex], so that it would become possible to prove that

[tex]
c(T)=c(0)
[/tex]

with some [itex]T\neq 0[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do you mean prove that c(dot)(T) = c(dot)(0)?
 
  • #3
No. I mean that the curve comes back to where it started from. (Not that it would point in the same direction at least twice.)
 
  • #4
jostpuur said:
Suppose that a function [itex]B:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] and [itex]c:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] are defined such that [itex]c[/itex] is differentiable, and

[tex]
\dot{c}(t) = B(c(t))
[/tex]

for all [itex]t[/itex]. The question is that what must be assumed of [itex]B[/itex], so that it would become possible to prove that

[tex]
c(T)=c(0)
[/tex]

with some [itex]T\neq 0[/itex]?

[tex]\oint _{\partial S}B \bullet ndS = 0[/tex] or B must be divergence free.
 
  • #5
That answer is incorrect.

[itex]n=2[/itex], [itex]B(x)=(x_1,-x_2)[/itex], [itex]c(t)=(e^t,e^{-t})[/itex] give a counter example.
 

1. What is the significance of proving c(T)=c(0) with T≠0 in regards to magnetic field lines?

This proof is important because it shows that the speed of a magnetic field line is constant, regardless of the length of the line. This supports the concept of magnetic flux conservation and helps to better understand the behavior of magnetic fields.

2. How is c(T)=c(0) with T≠0 proven?

This is typically proven through mathematical equations and experiments, such as using a magnetic compass to measure the direction and strength of the magnetic field at different points along a field line.

3. What is the relationship between magnetic field lines and magnetic flux?

Magnetic field lines and magnetic flux are closely related, as magnetic field lines represent the direction and strength of the magnetic field, while magnetic flux measures the amount of magnetic field passing through a given area. The proof of c(T)=c(0) with T≠0 supports the concept of magnetic flux conservation.

4. How does this proof impact our understanding of electromagnetic fields?

This proof helps to support the idea that magnetic fields behave similarly to electric fields. Just as the speed of an electric field is constant, the proof of c(T)=c(0) with T≠0 shows that the speed of a magnetic field is also constant. This helps to further our understanding of the relationship between electricity and magnetism.

5. What are some potential applications of this proof?

This proof has many practical applications, such as in the design of electric motors and generators, as well as in understanding the behavior of magnetic fields in space and in other natural phenomena. It also helps to validate the theories and principles of electromagnetism, which have many technological and scientific applications.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
788
Replies
1
Views
158
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
384
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
778
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
270
Back
Top