Magnetic field strength decrease much faster than the inverse square of the distance like gravity?

  • Thread starter Proof.Beh
  • Start date
  • #1
51
0
why does magnetic field strength decrease much faster than the inverse square of the distance like gravity? Is it because the force lines have to curve back to the source? Is magnetism also carried by an "imaginary" particle?

Thanks.
Mr Beh
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
Your first guess is basically correct. In the absence of monopoles the force law of magnetism is (at best) that of a dipole. I have no idea what an "imaginary" particle would mean.
 
  • #3
51
0
If we test that around of earth or a larger mass, space-time can help to force lines that curve to other sides according to GR?
 
  • #4
7
0
I think he means 'virtual partice', like in a Feynman diagram?
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
If we test that around of earth or a larger mass, space-time can help to force lines that curve to other sides according to GR?

What does this have to do with the original question? There is no fundamental difference between electrical and magnetic forces except for the lack of monopoles in the latter case. GR does distort space and certainly affects the solution to EM equations. But has little to do with the original post.
 
  • #6
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,950
19
Wait a minute; the magnetic field does obey an inverse square law...
 
  • #7
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
Wait a minute; the magnetic field does obey an inverse square law...

Yes, it does. From a monopole. And from a dipole but you have to sum the inverse squares. Which subtract to give an inverse cube. I hope that is what the poster is referring to.
 
  • #8
51
0
Hey guys, you didn't answer to elementary question. I am saying, if forces lines curve in a magnetic field then can we say that it is stronger than the strength space-time curvature at curving light around a large mass (for example sun) or not?

Of course I agree with adriansd, but what is it really? Does it identical with 'virtual partice' In a Feynman diagram?

Thanks.
Mr Beh
 
  • #9
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,950
19
Yes, it does. From a monopole. And from a dipole but you have to sum the inverse squares. Which subtract to give an inverse cube. I hope that is what the poster is referring to.
I was referring to the fact that the magnetic field generated by a current is proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source.
 
  • #10
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
I was referring to the fact that the magnetic field generated by a current is proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source.

Oh yeah, that. But thats a infinite linear source. The E field from an infinite line charge isn't inverse square either (even though the underlying point force law is). It doesn't seem to really matter though since the poster doesn't seem to be able to make a clear statement of what he does mean.
 
  • #11
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,950
19
Oh yeah, that. But thats a infinite linear source. The E field from an infinite line charge isn't inverse square either (even though the underlying point force law is). It doesn't seem to really matter though since the poster doesn't seem to be able to make a clear statement of what he does mean.
The magnetostatic field from an infinite wire is inverse-linear, just like the electrostatic field; they're essentially the same calculation! The only difference is that one has [itex]q\hat{r}[/itex] in the numerator, and the other has [itex]\vec{I} \times \hat{r}[/itex]. (And there's probably another constant factor I'm forgetting)
 

Related Threads on Magnetic field strength decrease much faster than the inverse square of the distance like gravity?

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
985
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
Top