Magnetic Flux from Infinite wire

As \rho varies, the direction of the field also varies, and so the angle between \vec{B} and \vec{dl} also varies. You need to use the dot product because you are working with vectors.
  • #1
KleZMeR
127
1

Homework Statement



Infinite wire on Z axis
Loop radius a lies in x,z plane, centered on positive x axis, with center a distance b away from origin.

Find flux through loop.


Homework Equations




B field => from the infinite wire, dependent on 1/rho, in the (phi) direction, = (UoI/2pi)*(1/rho)
flux = (B dot dA), where dA is normal to plane, so in the (Y) direction



The Attempt at a Solution



If am attaching my attempt. What I have done so far, is figured out my B (dot) dA, by taking (phi) from B field and changing it to cartesian, and dotting it with differential area of my loop, which is in (Y) direction, so my (X) component from the (phi) transformation zeroes out, and I am left with scalar flux.

My question is this:
I know that rho is the floating point, but the B field I am using is not the same for all values of rho, correct? It varies from (b-a) to (b+a) ?
Do I integrate across rho from (b-a) to (b+a) ?? or has this difference already been accounted for?
Should I be integrating across different form of B rather than just using the generic form from the infinite wire??
and if so, do I do this before I take the dot product?
It seems that rho is only dependent on an x coordinate because of the infinite wire, and not a z coordinate, so would there still a transformation of rho to cartesian for this integral?
I am stuck here, any help varying this rho would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.pdf
    51.3 KB · Views: 393
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Field B depends on rho as you wrote. Flux is:
[itex] \int_{0}^{A} B \cdot dA [/itex]
Since you know field B as the function of rho, you should also express differential area dA in terms of rho (and d(rho)), so you'll get dA = f(rho)d(rho). Then you integrate
[itex] \int_{a-b}^{a+b} B(\rho)f(\rho)d\rho [/itex].

Hope this would help
 
  • #3
fikus said:
Field B depends on rho as you wrote. Flux is:
[itex] \int_{0}^{A} B \cdot dA [/itex]
Since you know field B as the function of rho, you should also express differential area dA in terms of rho (and d(rho)), so you'll get dA = f(rho)d(rho). Then you integrate
[itex] \int_{a-b}^{a+b} B(\rho)f(\rho)d\rho [/itex].

Hope this would help

The loop is circular and hence has a constant radius so [itex]d \rho=0[/itex]...
 
  • #4
KleZMeR said:
flux = (B dot dA), where dA is normal to plane, so in the (Y) direction

The flux through a surface [itex]\mathcal{S}[/itex] is [tex]\int_{\mathcal{S}} \vec{B} \cdot \vec{dA}[/tex]...but you're not asked to find the flux through a surface; you're asked to find the flux through a loop, which is given by [tex]\oint_{\text{loop}} \vec{B} \cdot \vec{dl}[/tex] where [itex]\vec{dl}[/itex] is an infinitesimal length element for the loop.
 
  • #5
I think you're wrong, look at the picture in KleZMeR pdf. With rho I mean the distance from wire on z-axis, so rho is not constant through loop, if I understand the problem right.
 
  • #6
fikus said:
I think you're wrong, look at the picture in KleZMeR pdf. With rho I mean the distance from wire on z-axis, so rho is not constant through loop, if I understand the problem right.

The [itex]\rho[/itex] in his equation for the magnetic field represents the shortest distance from the wire on the z-axis to the field point. For any field point on the loop, that distance is just the radius of the loop; which is constant.
 
  • #7
The loop doesn't go around the wire, it has center moved for distance b from origin. Look at his sketch in attached pdf. Rho represents what you said, but the loop is not on constant rho, neither rho is the radius of the loop (which is a).
 
  • #8
Okay, yes I just realized the loop is not centered at the origin, so rho will vary over the circumference of the loop.
 
  • #9
Do I really need the transformation of (phi) vector into (X) and (Y)? Can I just assume that the B field through the loop is in the (Y) direction, and that the differential area element is in the (Y) direction as well

The integral of the cos term along the (Y) vector is giving me zeroes with limits 0->pi, and 0->2pi, and if I use limits of 0->pi/2, I get a factor of 2, and am still missing the (pi) factor in my areaSo in this case, can I assume that the element in terms of (rho) only is:
f(rho) d(rho),

and then is this just

(pi)*(rho)^2 d(rho) ??

Because wouldn't the pi term cover the earlier d(phi) that I am now eliminating?
 
  • #10
Again, you are trying to find the flux through a loop, not through a surface...you don't have a differential area element; you have a differential length element. You don't have an area integral; you have a path integral.

You need to start by finding an expression for [itex]\vec{dl}[/itex].
 
  • #11
Sorry, I have to disagree. The line integral around the loop is not a flux - Flux is always the number of field lines (or any other quantity) passing through a given area. In this case, the problem is to find the number of flux lines passing through the area of the loop.
 
  • #12
you don't really need any vectors, since area withing the loop and field are perpedicular. Differential area da is:

[tex] dA = \sqrt{a^2+(\rho-b)^2} d\rho [/tex]

Maybe I should sketch this, but I hope you understand that.
 
  • #13
I disagree with you gabbagabbahey also. He is looking for flux as naresh said.
 
  • #14
the field is not perpedicular to the normal of the surface! they have both the same direction. You should see that.
 
  • #15
your path integral is zero, since differential path element is perpendicular to magnetic field, of course, because there is no electric current through the loop, as states Ampere law. Your path integral gives total current through the loop which is zero of course. You don't get it right.
 
  • #16
hmmmm... After giving it more thought, I guess they must be looking for the flux through the surface enclosed by the loop...not the flux through the loop as I had interpreted this to mean...

Find flux through loop.
 
  • #17
that your flux is called electric current :) glad we cleard that.
 
  • #18
ok, well because I am the one asking the question, I can not really make an educated comment on the discussion, but I have been looking through my notes and I did find a similar problem done.

Is this a choice of English language?, where "through" can be chosen as through area enclosed, or through actual "surface" of loop, as in the surface of a line?, but the loop has no thickness, so how do field lines pass through line element? I don't know, possibly look at solution attached..

I also made a false pass before, I realized that that area element is 2*(pi)*(rho)* d(rho)
and with this attempt I integrate with b included, but it canceled out in the integral,

and I did the problem on my own in a different way, and got the same units, but still did it a bit wrong, with a factor of (2a) rather than the correct factor of: (b - sqrt( b^2 - a^2 )

so, in any case, I am attaching the notes I found
see attached
 

Attachments

  • Problem_1.pdf
    54.9 KB · Views: 225
  • #19
forget about that line integral, you need the surface one. From figure it should be clear why differential surface area (rectangle in figure) is as I wrote in one of previous posts.
 

Attachments

  • surface.jpg
    surface.jpg
    8 KB · Views: 559

What is magnetic flux from an infinite wire?

Magnetic flux from an infinite wire refers to the measure of the number of magnetic field lines passing through a surface perpendicular to the wire. It is a measure of the strength of the magnetic field produced by an infinite wire.

How is magnetic flux calculated from an infinite wire?

Magnetic flux can be calculated from an infinite wire using the formula Φ = B * A * cosθ, where Φ is the magnetic flux, B is the magnetic field strength, A is the area of the surface, and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the surface.

What factors affect the magnetic flux from an infinite wire?

The magnetic flux from an infinite wire is affected by the distance from the wire, the current flowing through the wire, and the angle between the wire and the surface. These factors influence the strength and direction of the magnetic field produced by the wire.

Can the magnetic flux from an infinite wire be negative?

Yes, the magnetic flux from an infinite wire can be negative. This occurs when the angle between the wire and the surface is greater than 90 degrees, causing the cosθ term in the formula to be negative. A negative flux indicates that the magnetic field lines are passing through the surface in the opposite direction.

How is the direction of the magnetic flux from an infinite wire determined?

The direction of the magnetic flux is determined by the right-hand rule. If you point your thumb in the direction of the current flowing through the wire, your fingers will curl in the direction of the magnetic field lines, indicating the direction of the magnetic flux.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
897
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
769
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
312
Replies
1
Views
891
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
190
Back
Top