Magnetic flux question

  1. This question might seem rather naive.
    We define the magentic flux through a loop by [itex]\Phi = \int \vec B \cdot d\vec a[/itex]. But an infinite number of different surfaces can be fitted to a given boundary how is the flux independent of the nature of the surface used?
  2. jcsd
  3. Galileo

    Galileo 1,999
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    In general, flux isn't defined through a loop (to my knowlegde), it is always defined through a surface. (It's a surface integral). Different surfaces bounding the same loop will in general give different answers.

    Exception: If the divergence of the field F is zero everywhere:[itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec F =0[/itex], then we can write [itex]\vec F=\vec \nabla \times
    \vec A[/itex] for some field A. Now you can use Stokes' theorem to prove that for a given boundary line, the flux is independent of the surface bounded by that line. Since div B=0 always and everywhere, you can unambigously talk about the magnetic flux through a loop (although I would still never say 'flux through a loop')
  4. Thanks for the reply.
    So, that means [itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0[/itex] guarantees that [itex]\int \vec B \cdot d\vec a[/itex] is the same for all surfaces within a given boundary?
  5. Galileo

    Galileo 1,999
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?