1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Problem

  1. Nov 29, 2011 #1
    This isn't really a homework problem, more of a "I'm-building-something-and-need-to-make-sure-the-physics-are-right-before-I-build-something-impractical" problem.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    2. Relevant equations
    3. The attempt at a solution
    (I grouped it all together, easier for me to not separate each segment)

    I need to spin a motor handle/crank at 25,000 rpm. I need to show that using a single flywheel attached to the spinning motor handle is unpractical.

    I know that 25,000rpm is ~2618 rad/sec; this value should be angular frequency, ω, correct?

    Then relating that to torque, tau = Iω, where I = mr^2 for a ring of radius r and mass m. And torque also equals tau = rFsinθ, where θ = 90°.

    Therefore, Iω = rF

    and F = mrω.

    Assuming m = 1 kg, r = 0.5 m, F = ~1309 N

    Therefore torque = ~655 Nm.

    Are the physics relationships correct?

    Thanks in advance.

    EDIT: Also, tangential velocity is v = rω, correct?
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2011
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 29, 2011 #2

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Pro

    What's a motor handle/crank? What's a motor handle? Are they the same thing? What's the purpose of the flywheel? What is to be considered "unpractical"?

    At 25,000 rpm you're going to have to be awfully careful about symmetry and balance. Material stresses and strains could lead to "an unfortunate incident" type of behavior.
    Yes.
    Is the flywheel a ring or a solid disk?
    No, mrω has the units of linear momentum. And what force are you describing by F? How is this force supposed to be applied?
    You need to describe the physical system in more detail. Because the description is vague it's not possible to comment with any accuracy.
    Yup.
     
  4. Nov 29, 2011 #3
    Re: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Pro

    Thanks for the reply.

    I'm powering an 18V DC Motor using an electric dremel connected to the motor shaft / "handle" (idk if you're familiar with small DC motors, there's a little central shaft the sticks out of the body that is rotated to produce voltage) that's spinning at 25,000rpm. I need to show that trying to build a hand crank that one can rotate by hand is unpractical due to the high angular velocity required.

    The flywheel is a ring.

    The force in question is supposed to be the force applied at the edge of the flywheel (i.e. where a handle might go) perpendicular to the radius, since tau = r x F.

    Does that clear some stuff up? Let me know.

    Thanks.
     
  5. Nov 29, 2011 #4

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Pro

    Force won't determine the rotation speed. For a frictionless system, ANY force that provides torque will eventually lead to infinite angular speed! The trick will be applying the torque!

    I think you'll have to look elsewhere for the limiting factors. For example, how might you determine what the maximum rate of motion of a human arm might be for the desired action?
     
  6. Nov 30, 2011 #5
    Re: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Pro

    Well I reasoned that since v = rω, given a flywheel with a radius of 0.5 m (anything larger would be impractical since 0.5 is pushing the practical size limit), the tangential velocity would be 1309 m/s or 2928 mph (for a value that's easier to visualize).

    Therefore, no matter what speed the human arm can generate, it would not get anywhere close to the required speed, thereby making a hand crank impractical.

    Is the physics of this reasoning valid?

    Thanks for all the help, btw. It's been a good while since I've done rotational motion stuff.
     
  7. Nov 30, 2011 #6

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Pro

    While I agree with your conclusion, I won't be able to agree with your "physics by assertion" :smile: For a proper physics based argument you need to show why an arm cannot move fast enough, either by calculation or by experiment (You could see how many times you can move your hand, as fast as you can, in the required rotary motion over a given time interval. Have someone time it. What RPM can you achieve? BY what factor does it fall short of the required value? Is it plausible that practice would allow you to make up the difference?)
    I'm happy to help!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Making Sure Physics Calculations Are Correct For A Rotational Motion / Torque Problem
Loading...