Here you go. I’m interested in what the experts say about this. On another forum, my attention was drawn to this article: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technol...ains-commonly-flooded-male-dna-225612162.html Male DNA? Female DNA? There’s no such thing, surely. Only human DNA. I mean, I know about the ‘Y’ chromosome, but apart from the reality of what that is and how it does what it does, that is clearly not what they mean here. So is this bad science or bad journalism? I am going to be astonished if you tell me that it is both good science and good journalism. It will put me back pretty much to square one.