• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Mandl and Shaw 4.3

  • Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date
  • #1
523
0
[SOLVED] Mandl and Shaw 4.3

The question is to show that the charge current density operator [itex]s^\mu = - ec \bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi[/itex] for the Dirac Lagrangian commutes at spacelike separated points. Ie

[itex][s^\mu(x),s^\nu(y)] = 0 [/itex] for [itex](x-y)^2 < 0[/itex].

By microcauality we have [itex]\{ \psi(x), \bar{\psi}(y) \} = 0[/itex].

The commutator is

[itex]e^2c^2( \bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi (x) \bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi(y)-\bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi(y) \bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi (x) )[/itex]

I tried to evaluate this in index notation. The first term is

[itex]\left(\bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi (x) \bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi(y)\right)_{\alpha\beta} = \left(\bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi (x) \right)_{\alpha\epsilon}\left( \bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi(y)\right)_{\epsilon\beta} = \bar{\psi}_\alpha (x) (\gamma^\mu)_{\epsilon\gamma} \psi_\gamma (x) \bar{\psi}_\epsilon (y)(\gamma^\nu)_{\beta\delta}\psi_\delta(y) [/itex]

[itex]=\bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\gamma (x) \bar{\psi}_\epsilon(y)\psi_\delta (y)(\gamma^\mu)_{\epsilon\gamma} (\gamma^\nu)_{\beta\delta}[/itex].

Minus the second term is

[itex]\left(\bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi (y) \bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi(x)\right)_{\alpha\beta}[/itex].

If I simply expand this as [itex]\left(\bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi (y)\right)_{\alpha\epsilon}\left( \bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi(x)\right)_{\epsilon\beta}[/itex] I get a different answer to the first term. What I would like to do is to equate this to

[itex]\left(\bar{\psi}(y)\gamma^\nu\psi (y)\right)_{\epsilon\beta}\left( \bar{\psi}(x)\gamma^\mu\psi(x)\right)_{\alpha\epsilon}[/itex] and then use the anti-commutation relations to show this is the same as the first term.

If A and B are Hermitian and so is AB then [itex](AB)_{\alpha\beta} = (AB)^\ast_{\beta\alpha} = a_{\beta\epsilon}^\ast b_{\epsilon\alpha}^\ast = a_{\epsilon\beta}b_{\alpha\epsilon}[/itex]. But in my case the product of the two matrices is not Hermitian so I can't do that.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
523
0
Turned out to be something totally stupid. I was interpreting the current as quadruple of matrices when it is in fact a quadruple of complex numbers.
 
  • #3


Ok,

[j[tex]^{\mu}[/tex], j[tex]^{\nu}[/tex]] =0

where j[tex]^{\mu}[/tex] =[tex]\overline{\psi}(x)[/tex][tex]\gamma[/tex][tex]^{\mu}[/tex][tex]\psi (x)[/tex]

Is this true?
 

Related Threads for: Mandl and Shaw 4.3

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
991
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
839
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Top