(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); [SOLVED] Mandl and Shaw 5.1

To show

[itex]-\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2 \quad \mathrm{and} \quad -\frac{1}{2}\partial_\nu A_\mu \partial^\nu A^\mu[/itex]

represent the same Lagrangian it suffices to show that

[itex]\partial_\nu A_\mu\partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial_\nu A^\nu \partial_\mu A^\mu[/itex] is at most a 4-divergence.

The trouble is, I have no idea why this would be the case. Is this a matter of utilizing the product rule in some clever way?

Edit: Yes it is: factor out [itex]\partial_\nu[/itex].

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mandl and Shaw 5.1

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**