1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Manifolds 2

  1. Sep 23, 2006 #1
    Define f:R->R by fx = 0 if x<=0 and e^-1/x if x>0

    Show that f is c^inf and that all the derivatives of f at 0 vanish; that is, f^(k)0=0 for every k.


    After taking first and secondderivatives we just apply l'hostpials rule to show that the derivatives vanish.

    My problem is for the kth derivative.

    We know after taking the derivative we get some polynomail say p(x) so

    f^k(x) = p(x) * e^-1/x


    What do I do now?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2006 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    After you differentiate e^-{1/x} some number of times you only ever end up with e^-{1/x}*(some type of function of x), work out what 'type' of function I mean, and then show that for any function of that type the limit is zero as x tends to zero.
     
  4. Sep 24, 2006 #3
    I assume that by that type of function you mean the polynomial I spoke of. Do I need to contruct a lemma?
     
  5. Sep 24, 2006 #4

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You need to prove something. What you call it is up to you.
     
  6. Oct 9, 2006 #5
    Show that If g: R -> R is analytic in a nbhrd of 0 then gx = sum g^k0 x^k/k! for all x in the symmetric int. with center 0. then f, as defined above, cannot be analytic at 0

    Well it is assumed that all derivatives vanish at 0 therefore no power series centered at 0 converges to f on a nbhrd of 0

    Is that enough justifcation?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Manifolds 2
  1. Smooth manifolds (Replies: 2)

Loading...