Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maple vs. Mathematica

  1. Feb 15, 2007 #1

    Angelos

    User Avatar

    Hi...

    I have a simply question...Which program is better and why? Maple or Mathematica?
     
    Angelos, Feb 15, 2007
  2. jcsd
    Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org
  3. Feb 15, 2007 #2

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Insights Author

    Maple, because that is the only one of the two to which I have access.
     
    D H, Feb 15, 2007
  4. Feb 15, 2007 #3

    Bitter

    User Avatar

    I prefer mathematica. To me, it seems rather powerful and simple once you get used to the annoying commands.
     
    Bitter, Feb 15, 2007
  5. Feb 15, 2007 #4

    CPL.Luke

    User Avatar

    I decided on male a while back because it had a more intuitive/ mathematical interface, and didn't make you use commands for 99% of its functions. however I have never used or seen a copy of mathematica so I could be wrong.
     
    CPL.Luke, Feb 15, 2007
  6. Feb 15, 2007 #5

    mgiddy911

    User Avatar

    I have only used maple, and it takes some getting used to but is definitely a very powerful program, we used it quite a lot in my calc 3 class as far as graphing in 3 dimensions, and doing multiple Integration and/or flux-divergence work
     
    mgiddy911, Feb 15, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Maple vs. Mathematica

  1. Mathematica vs Maple (Replies: 7)

  2. Matlab vs Maple vs Mathematica (Replies: 18)

  3. Matlab vs mathematica vs maple? (Replies: 10)

  4. Maple 10 vs. Mathematica 5.2 (Replies: 9)

  5. Maple vs Mathematica ? (Replies: 14)

Loading...