Martian Geology -- Rock Types

  • Thread starter bitznbitez
  • Start date
  • #1
bitznbitez
Gold Member
16
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

I ran into a link from a NASA page over to an Astrobiology webzine. In the article it referenced "sedimentary rock" on Mars. I don't really care about all the other claims of this article, some rather fantastic claims frankly. Rather I am interested in the use of the phrase sedimentary rock.

Have we established that martian sedimentary rock, and by that inferred its formation, is equivalent to what we commonly call sedimentary, and if so how much of observed martian rock would be classed as sedimentary ?

I'm interested in finding where martian rock formations are discussed in any substantial way.....

Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,847
1,644
  • #3
463
234
Simon's second link provides only the abstract; the full article is behind a pay-wall, but you can access it http://www.vashonsd.org/mcmurray/science/justin/News/AAAS1927.pdf [Broken]. It is worth reading.

There are many books that could address questions you may have on Martian sediments - what level of detail does your curiosity extend to?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
bitznbitez
Gold Member
16
1
Thanks for the links. The existence of significant quantities of sedimentary rock suggests a substantial quantity of liquid on the martian surface at one time. So i wanted to be sure there weren't explinations of sedimentary in the martian context that didn't assume liquids involved in the formation. And naturally the percentage of surface rock we would call sedimentary would potentially infer the quantity of liquid historically.
 
  • #5
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
  • #6
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2019 Award
9,129
7,095
The existence of significant quantities of sedimentary rock suggests a substantial quantity of liquid on the martian surface at one time. So i wanted to be sure there weren't explinations of sedimentary in the martian context that didn't assume liquids involved in the formation.
You are looking at it too narrowly. Sedimentary deposits do not just infer water deposition ...
any material that is eroded and redeposited also falls into that category .... so ALL wind blown dust and dirt is included as well
and the Martian atmosphere is very good at that with its huge regular dust storms

cheers
Dave
 
  • #7
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
Water is not mandatory, just about any liquid will suffice.
 
  • #8
463
234
Water is not mandatory, just about any liquid will suffice.
Let's extend that to "just about any fluid will suffice" and that will include Davenn's aeolian deposition. Some of the erosional - and consequently depositional - features on Mars, including recent ones, have been attributed to carbon dioxide.

For me the interesting thing is that, regardless of the planet and hence the fluid and the solids involved, the physics leads to similar landforms and depositional structures. Think of the views of Titan provided by the Huygens lander.
 

Related Threads on Martian Geology -- Rock Types

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Top