Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maschkes theorem/group rings

  1. Oct 22, 2007 #1
    In the statement of Maschke's theroem we are told 'Let G be a finite group and F a field in which |G| not equal to zero. As an example we are told if our group was C2 (cyclic) then we could not have F=F2 (the field with 2 elements). I fail to see how C2 and F2 are related, surely |C2|=2 regardless of F. I do not see how changing the field changes the size of the group. What am I missing??
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 22, 2007 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It doesn't alter the size of the group. Nothing says that choosing the field changes the size of the group - I don't see where you got that conclusion from.

    |C_2| is certainly 2, and Maschke's result holds in any field where 2 is invertible (i.e. precisely not F_2 or any extension).

    Maschke's theorem, or its proof, requires that one is able to multiply through by the multiplicative inverse of |G| in F.
     
  4. Oct 25, 2007 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    All the versions of Maschke's theorem that I am familiar with say "over a field of characteristic k where k does not divide |G|" or the equivalent "Over a field in which |G| is not a zero divisor". If your text actually says "over a field in which |G| not equal to zero"- that is very sloppy language.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Maschkes theorem/group rings
  1. Groups, Rings, Fields? (Replies: 3)

  2. Group rings (Replies: 4)

Loading...