Mass & Emittance: Does Heat Affect Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ABHoT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between mass, emittance, and heat. It posits that while mass can be reduced by emittance, heating an object does not necessarily lead to a quicker reduction in mass. Instead, heating increases energy emission, which can affect mass differently depending on the state of the object. The conversation highlights that mass is influenced by energy content, particularly thermal energy, until thermal equilibrium is reached. Overall, the complexities of mass and energy interactions are emphasized, particularly in relation to thermal emissions.
ABHoT
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Is mass reduced by emittance?
If so if you heat an object would its mass reduce quicker?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ABHoT said:
Is mass reduced by emittance?

Yes.

If so if you heat an object would its mass reduce quicker?

No. It will either reduce slower or increase.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the answer.
I think I'm missing something:

If you heat an object energy emission increases.
Mass is reduced by emmitance.
Heating an object increases its mass.

Am I mis-understanding what mass is?

If all matter/mass gives off radiation/electromagnetic waves and emmitance reduces mass does that mean that all mass in the universe is slowly turning into energy?
 
ABHoT said:
Thanks for the answer.
I think I'm missing something:

If you heat an object energy emission increases.
Mass is reduced by emmitance.
Heating an object increases its mass.

Ok, it depends are you referring to the mass before heating, or after. We are talking about thermal emissions. Object will cease to radiate energy when it reaches thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. So, if your question was "is energy content contributing to the mass content?", answer is yes. But if you omit radioactive processes, which require special conditions (temperature, pressure, or high atomic number for spontaneous decay), object can radiate only its 'energy content' (thermal energy, chemical bonds energy).
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top