Masses connected by string/rod

  • Thread starter dinmore
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0
Hi,

I'm making a game and could do with a hand working out how to simulate the main element of it. I'm sure I should be able to work this out, it seems relativly simple, but I'm so out of practice the solutions eluding me.

I need to simulate two point masses connected by a massless string or rod (it doesn't matter which; so whichever's easiest). I'm fine with the basics of moving them about but can't figure out how to calculate the force exerted on each mass by the string/rod. I guess it'd be derived from the velocities of the opposite mass but further than that I'm stuck.

Can anyone help?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
137
0
actually the force acting on the mass can be calculated from a movement of the attached mass. That is not exactly useless because you can define the movement. In the case of the rod the situation is fairly simple- the 3D translation plus rotation with respect to the center of mass; The interobject distance is fixed.

For a string the situation is slightly mor complicated, because the interobject distance is not fixed. The force should, however, act along the string, so we can use the second Newton's law.

Let's consider , for example, a case when two masses are at rest and one mass gets an impuls in an arbitrary direction. It will move freely until the distance between the masses wil be equal to the string length. Then the impulse perpendicular to the string will remain unchanged (no force is acting in that direction). As to the implulse along the string, we can consider this as an impact along the string, so we can find the impulses after the impact. It will be also a good idea to use the inertial system where the total impulse is zero, because it should remain zero unless an external force is acting on our objects.
 
  • #3
3
0
Ah, of course. I was forgetting all about the system having a centre of mass, silly me. Think I'll use the rod version for simplicity (not just calculations - drawing a slack string right would be nasty), maybe I'll do it with string in the next version.

Now all I've gotta do is dig out the angular motion equations.

Thanks for that.
 
  • #4
3
0
Heh. Actually I think it's easier to work out what's going on with string. Think I'll go with that instead.
 

Related Threads on Masses connected by string/rod

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
723
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
854
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
985
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top