1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mastubara transform conventions

  1. Jul 9, 2011 #1
    Hello,

    When calculating the dynamic structure factor I need to express [tex]\rho(q)[/tex] in terms of creation and annihilation operators. I tried a direct calculation of the form

    [tex] \rho_q = \int e^{i q x} \bar{\psi}(x) \psi(x)[/tex]
    [tex] = \int e^{iqx} \sum_{k k'} e^{ikx} \bar{\psi}_k e^{-ik'x} \psi_{k'} [/tex]
    [tex] = \sum_k \bar{\psi}_k \psi_{k+q} [/tex]

    however in all of the literature the result is stated

    [tex]\rho_q = \sum_k \bar{\psi}_{k+q} \psi_k [/tex]

    I've thought of the following possible causes for this discrepancy:
    1. I'm using the wrong sign convention for the transform: WRONG because even if I switch all of the signs of the exponents we get back the same result.
    2. ONLY the sign of rho's exponent is wrong: possible, because it seems that it is arbitrary to decide that rho transforms like psi and not like psi bar.

    This is where I'm at. I would really like to understand the source of the mistake.

    Thanks for any help!!
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Mastubara transform conventions
  1. Convention problem (Replies: 1)

  2. Conventional current? (Replies: 4)

  3. Sign conventions (Replies: 4)

  4. Conventional Current (Replies: 10)

  5. Conventional Current (Replies: 2)

Loading...