- #36
Pengwuino
Gold Member
- 5,124
- 20
I dunno... buy me a beaker and I'm all for it
OK, good point. I'll concede on that. Although in my defense, (I think) I'm with you on the how one rates. I don't really rate in the form of a "critique", I rate a 5 if I applauded at the end, and a 1 of I booed. The actual critique is secondary and is quite difficult to write mostly. Lately, I've given up and just posted the rating.tribdog said:ahh, you see, here's the rub. I don't care why you rated it so high. I didn't like the movie. I don't go to ratings to be told why a movie deserves a certain score, I go to ratings to find out if a movie is good.
One of the things I liked about it was that is wasn't a Tom Cruise movie. At least, I've never before seen him a blind-terriified, cowardly shlub running so pell-mell for his very life as to not have any time to be a hero...Moonbear said:...not seeing another movie staring Tom Cruise ...
I give this comment one star out of five.DaveC426913 said:BTW, you can afford to cut him some slack. He's going to fall very, VERY hard when the signed Contract-to-act-as-my-beard,-my-girlfriend-and-the-mother-of-my-child eventually leaks out.
If he were a symbol of Christianity, and got himself baptized and then ordained in public, and then the world found out he was a Scientologist posing as a Christian - yeah, I'm thinkin' he would be rather less popular in the eyes of Christian movie-goers.tribdog said:no it won't. We are talking Hollywood here. If being a crazy scientologist hasn't hurt him being a homosexual sure isn't going to. Heck, if he wasn't so crazy I'd probably blow him and I'm not even gay.
"Synopsis: A man recaptures his college days by starting a frat house.
Review: Suffered badly from Variety Show Sketch Syndrome - this was a twenty minute sketch blown up into two hours. Literally: the first twenty minutes were quite funny, and then the rest of the movie was really lame. Really lame. eg.1: The climactic action involved a bit-part character wallking up the the lead, introducing herself, and handing him an audio tape. eg.2: The subplot romantic interest, after a misunderstanding and stepping out of the picture, just stepped back in - the lead asked what happened and she told him the misunderstanding (i.e. what should have been the obligatory scene leading to their reconciliation actually happened entirely off-screen).
DaveC426913 said:... the review for a completely different movie! That was Old School. It was entered with the same date as School of Rock, so the query mixed up the review. I've fixed it now.
I've got a feeling that "Genre" field in that database probably just defaults to "musical" (or perhaps defaults to whatever the last entry was) if no genre field is specified. I noticed a few movies where the genre seemed to be incorrect.I think the classification of Schindler's List as 'musical' is the highlight for me.
Well to me that's only a very superficial thing. I'd rather judge it on the content of the reviews rather than such superficial nit picking.haha I like the rundown of the rating system
"1 star : Terrible, stinky"
What is this guy, 8?
What? I should put more care into the rating description than they put into the script?Pengwuino said:haha I like the rundown of the rating system
"1 star : Terrible, stinky"
What is this guy, 8?
Yeah. Uh, just call me Microsoft. I use my users as beta-testers. : sheepish : It was actually a mistranslation when moving the database. Dramas were listed as musicals.Curious3141 said:I think the classification of Schindler's List as 'musical' is the highlight for me.
Well, you can thank my wife, and a democratic** movie-picking system, for at least seeing those.Mindscrape said:What's with all the high chick flick ratings?
DaveC426913 said:Besides, aren't you the teenybopper around here? :rofl: :rofl:
DaveC426913 said:I am old enough to have been a teen when Star Wars came out...
And I'm not unemployed, I just like to get out to a flick about once a week. It only takes 15 minutes to write a review.