Math question

I always learned this in math, but never really questioned it.

why does [tex] n^0=1 [/tex]
 

LeonhardEuler

Gold Member
858
1
Universe_Man said:
I always learned this in math, but never really questioned it.

why does [tex] n^0=1 [/tex]
Alright, first you know [itex]x=x^1[/itex] and [itex]x^1x^1=x^{1+1}=x^2[/itex], right? And in general, [itex]x^ax^b=x^{a+b}[/itex] when a and b are greater than or equal to one. So why not define [itex]x^0[/itex] so that this is true even if a or b is zero? If this is the case then
[tex]x^0x^a=x^{a+0}=x^a[/tex]
We have x0xa=xa, so as long as x is not zero we can divide by xa to come out with [itex]x^0=1[/itex].

More generally, powers are defined so that [itex]x^ax^b=x^{a+b}[/itex] is true even when a and b are not integers and even when they are not real.
 
Last edited:
31
0
A simple proof:

Because [tex] (n^a)*(n^b) = n^{a+b}[/tex],
it can be said that [tex] n^0 [/tex] is equivalent to [tex] n^1 * n^{-1}[/tex].
[tex] n * (1/n) = 1 [/tex],
therefore, [tex] n^0 = 1 [/tex]
 
Last edited:
OH OH ok I get it, thanks alot guys.
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,732
885
In other words, if we want aman= an+m to be true for 0 as well as positive integer value of m and n, we must define a0= 1.
It is also true that if we want aman= an+m to be true for negative integer powers, then we must have ana-n= a0= 1. In other words, we must define [itex]a^{-n}= \frac{1}{n}[/itex].

To see how we must define [itex]a^{\frac{1}{n}}[/itex], look at the law
(an)m= amn.
 

Related Threads for: Math question

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
516
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Top