Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Math Rules Chem

  1. Dec 3, 2003 #1
    Math Rules Chem:)

    [tex]NO_3[/tex]

    What is the molecular formula of this compound if molar mass is 324.06.

    Math begins:

    [tex]aN + bO = 324.06[/tex]

    [tex]N=14, O = 16[/tex]

    [tex]14a + 16b = 324.06[/tex]

    [tex]N = O/3, O = 3N, a = b/3, b = 3a[/tex]

    [tex]a = 162.03/32 =~ 5, b =~ 15. [/tex]

    [tex]N_{5}O_{15}[/tex]
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 3, 2003 #2
    If N=14 and and N=O/3, then 14=O/3 so O=14/3=4.66666... but you say O=16. I think I'm confused.
     
  4. Dec 3, 2003 #3

    How old are you?
     
  5. Dec 4, 2003 #4
    Is there a point to this thread?
     
  6. Dec 4, 2003 #5
    What, did I say something wrong?


    Oh. Now I see. 14 and 16 are the amu of them. I didn't look at it.
     
  7. Dec 5, 2003 #6

    ShawnD

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: Math Rules Chem:)

    Your work is wrong. The question has no answer. First it TELLS you the formula then it asks for a formula OF THE SAME COMPOUND but with a different mass.
    Anybody who knows anything about chemistry will tell you that the same compound will have the same formula. You can't just multiply each of the subscripts by a common factor to get a new formula for "the same compound", it doesn't work like that. OH and H2O2 are NOT the same. They don't have the same name, properties, or even charge. Let's look at another formula; C3H8. If we multiply the subscripts by 2 we get C6H16. The problem is that C6H16 doesn't even exist; it has too many hydrogens.

    You can't just multiply the subscripts by a common factor like that.
     
  8. Dec 5, 2003 #7

    FZ+

    User Avatar

    ShawnD: I think you need to look into the context of this particular question. The first line is the empirical formulae, which is essentially just the ratios of atoms in each molecule of the compound. The answer PO derived is correct.

    Though IMHO, he dragged it out much more than he should have. The simplest way is just to calculate molar mass for the empirical formula, divide this from your given real mass, and multiple each subscript by the result of the above.
     
  9. Dec 6, 2003 #8

    I should write a research paper on this :) Using real math to solve chemistry.
     
  10. Dec 6, 2003 #9

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Too bad your math does not take into the equation the chemical relevancy of the answer.

    As Shawn said, C3H8 exists, but C6H16 (everything times 2) does not.
     
  11. Dec 6, 2003 #10

    I don't know what you are talking about because I'm still teaching myself chemistry... and probably some advance stuff u were mentioning.

    Anyways, like every other thing, there was a pioneer. :) Be glad you replied to this thread today, because .... :smile: :wink:
     
  12. Dec 6, 2003 #11

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    There already is a formula for the kind of compound I mentioned (alkanes):

    H = 2x C + 2

    So it is C3H8 and C6H14.
     
  13. Dec 14, 2003 #12

    What does that have to do with NO?
     
  14. Dec 16, 2003 #13
    they're just proving that you can't just have hydroxide and h2o2 equal in your equations
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Math Rules Chem
  1. Organic Chem (Replies: 4)

  2. Chem Trends (Replies: 2)

  3. Physical chem (Replies: 8)

  4. Chem Concept (Replies: 6)

  5. Chem demonstrations (Replies: 1)

Loading...