Proving pa for All Integers n > 14 Using Mathematical Induction

In summary: 2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) +
  • #1
evil1
2
0
Induction Hypothesis:

In fact pa is true for all integers n greater than a particular base value and you should complete the proof given below to use the principle of mathematical induction to prove this.

pa : n-2 < (n^2 – 3n)/12

Base case is n = 14
Because: n-2 < (n^2 – 3n)/12
14-2 < (196-42)/12
12 < 154/12
12 < 12.83

Inductive step
Inductive Hypothesis : Assume pa(k) is true for k > 14. Thus k-2 <(k^2 – 3k)/12.

We must prove that pa(k+1) is true i.e. that (k+1)-2 < ((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12

Now to prove such an inequality we always start with the more complicated side:
((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12 = (k^2 + 2k +1 – 3k – 3)/12

= (k^2 – 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12

> ...?... + (2k-2)/12 ____because

> ...??... because



the dotted white line need to be filled in and the because u have to give reasons...

This is the question i have been given to do although no idea on how to finish it any ideas anyone ?

thanks

ok i changed it to 14 although not sure yet on how to finish it, this for me is just baffling
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assume pa(k) is true for some k > 10
It should be "Assume pa(k) is true for some k >= 14 "


= (k^2 – 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12

> ... + (2k-2)/12 ……(b) because

What does the induction hypothesis tell you ?
 
  • #3
To complete the proof using the principle of mathematical induction, we need to show that if pa(k) is true, then pa(k+1) is also true. In other words, we need to show that if k-2 < (k^2 – 3k)/12, then (k+1)-2 < ((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12.

To do this, we can start by expanding the right side of the inequality:

((k+1)^2 – 3(k+1))/12 = (k^2 + 2k +1 – 3k – 3)/12 = (k^2 – 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12

Since we assumed that k-2 < (k^2 – 3k)/12, we can substitute it into the first term on the right side:

(k^2 – 3k)/12 + (2k-2)/12 > (k-2) + (2k-2)/12

Now, we can simplify the right side by combining like terms:

(k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (12k-24 + 2k-2)/12 = (14k-26)/12

Since k > 14, we know that 14k-26 is positive, so we can further simplify the right side by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 12:

(14k-26)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 > (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-2)/12 = (k-2) + (2k-
 

1. What is mathematical induction and how does it work?

Mathematical induction is a method of proving a statement or formula that holds true for all natural numbers. It involves two steps: the base case where the statement is proven true for the first natural number, and the inductive step where it is shown that if the statement holds true for a particular number, it must also hold true for the next number.

2. Why is the statement being proven only for n > 14?

In this particular proof, the statement is being proven for all integers n greater than 14 because that is the base case that has been set. This means that the statement has been proven true for n = 15, and now we must show that if it holds true for n = 15, it must also hold true for n = 16, and so on.

3. Can we use mathematical induction to prove statements for all real numbers?

No, mathematical induction can only be used to prove statements for natural numbers. This is because the inductive step relies on the fact that the statement holds true for the previous natural number, which cannot be applied to real numbers since they do not have a defined order.

4. Why is proving pa for All Integers n > 14 important?

Proving this statement is important because it demonstrates the power and usefulness of mathematical induction. It also has practical applications in areas such as computer algorithms and number theory.

5. Are there any alternative methods for proving this statement?

Yes, there are alternative methods for proving this statement, such as direct proof or proof by contradiction. However, mathematical induction is often the most efficient and elegant method for proving statements that hold true for all natural numbers.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
941
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
792
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top