- #1

- 319

- 0

What is the mathematicians modern rigorous definition of number ?

thanks

Roger

thanks

Roger

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter roger
- Start date

- #1

- 319

- 0

What is the mathematicians modern rigorous definition of number ?

thanks

Roger

thanks

Roger

- #2

jcsd

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,097

- 12

There isn't one!

- #3

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 10,025

- 134

A "number system" is some set, associated typically by some "operations" that you can use upon the elements of the set, for example "adding" two of the "numbers" together.

This is my very informal view of this, however..

- #4

Zurtex

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 1,120

- 1

What type of number? A natural number? An integer? A quotient? A real number? A complex number? A hyper-real number? A hyper-complex number? A trans-finite number? A surreal number?...roger said:What is the mathematicians modern rigorous definition of number ?

thanks

Roger

All of these have different definitions.

- #5

- 129

- 0

It is quite funny that "element" and "number" mean the same thing. So in fact we can define anything we want as a number !

- #6

jcsd

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,097

- 12

hello3719 said:

It is quite funny that "element" and "number" mean the same thing. So in fact we can define anything we want as a number !

Some collection of things whose members we often refer to as numbers are not sets, to give you an example the 'surreal numbers' form a proper class (i.e. they do not form a set).

Element and number are not synonyms; it certainly is not common to call every member of a set (or a class) a number.

- #7

- 319

- 0

the last comment made is true I guess in the sense that the two words element and number, are equivalent in meaning.

is it wrong to define it as a quantity of things eg apples ?

- #8

- 506

- 1

That definition is misleading. You end up having to twist and distort it to an unrecognizable lump after encountering various number systems. Considering just the negative integers, you then have to modify it by "also an absence of quantity" or some other interpretation. It only goes downhill from there. What quantity does sqrt(-1) measure ? Then you start to redefine quantity until the original statement is meaningless. While all quantities may be described by numbers, not all numbers represent quantities. Some are quite qualitative.roger said:is it wrong to define it as a quantity of things eg apples ?

Last edited:

- #9

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,847

- 966

hello3719 said:

It is quite funny that "element" and "number" mean the same thing. So in fact we can define anything we want as a number !

No, no one said that- a "number" is an element of some specifically defined sets, not just any set! In order to be a "number system" the set must have other things associated with it- primarily operations such as addition or multiplication. Of course,mathematicians do, regularly, define such operations for all kinds of "things" so we

- #10

Zurtex

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 1,120

- 1

In fact to demonstrate such a thing one of my first lectures last year for a course started off by creating a set of cutlery and using them as numbers after defining addition and multiplication on them.HallsofIvy said:No, no one said that- a "number" is an element of some specifically defined sets, not just any set! In order to be a "number system" the set must have other things associated with it- primarily operations such as addition or multiplication. Of course,mathematicians do, regularly, define such operations for all kinds of "things" so wecouldin a very specific way "define" anything we want as a number!

Share: