- #1
Schrodinger's Dog
- 835
- 7
I've noticed a lot of mathematics on this forum revovles around proofs, but have not really come across any in depth proofs as such and so am unfamilliar with much of the topics discussed here, and in fact some I can't really follow.
I got to thinking though at which point does it become required to see the proof of something in physics in general, for example I can quite easilly understand how a differential works from looking at say the proof for x^2, which is simple to follow when broken down. But I'm not entirely sure I need to prove much of the mathematics I'm learning and it's fine once you know the underlying principles and simple proofs to just assume it works in all cases.
What I'm really asking is how important are proofs of maths in physics, and at what point does it become important to really know how to prove say why binomial distibution works. Or is it only really necessary at the highest levels to have a deep understanding and at lower levels it's more important to be able to fluently use the mathematical constructs. The reason I ask is I find myself asking why it is necessary to prove for example that [tex] nx^{n-1}[/tex] works in all cases when simply applying it and knowing how generally differentials work is enough?
Is their a deal of proofs in the learning of physics at say degree level or is this approached more in mathematics?
I got to thinking though at which point does it become required to see the proof of something in physics in general, for example I can quite easilly understand how a differential works from looking at say the proof for x^2, which is simple to follow when broken down. But I'm not entirely sure I need to prove much of the mathematics I'm learning and it's fine once you know the underlying principles and simple proofs to just assume it works in all cases.
What I'm really asking is how important are proofs of maths in physics, and at what point does it become important to really know how to prove say why binomial distibution works. Or is it only really necessary at the highest levels to have a deep understanding and at lower levels it's more important to be able to fluently use the mathematical constructs. The reason I ask is I find myself asking why it is necessary to prove for example that [tex] nx^{n-1}[/tex] works in all cases when simply applying it and knowing how generally differentials work is enough?
Is their a deal of proofs in the learning of physics at say degree level or is this approached more in mathematics?
Last edited: