1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Matrices question

  1. Aug 6, 2005 #1
    when you're multiplying two matrices together does it affect the answer at all if you swap the columns around in one of the matrices?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 6, 2005 #2
    yes it does, just look at the defnition of matrix multiplication :

    [tex](AB)_{ij} = \Sigma_k a_{ik}b_{kj}[/tex]

    try for yourself with an example

    Here is some extra info : Matrix Multiplication
    marlon
     
  4. Aug 6, 2005 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Did you consider doing a little experimentation?

    What is [tex]\left( \begin{array}{ccc}1&2\\3&2\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc}2&-1\\2&1\end{array}\right)[/tex]?

    Is that the same as [tex]\left( \begin{array}{ccc}1&2\\3&2\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1&2\\1&2\end{array}\right)[/tex]?
     
  5. Aug 6, 2005 #4
    Matrix multiplication is associative but not commutative.

    E.g. A(BC) equals (AB)C but AB does not equal BA.

    The Bob (2004 ©)
     
  6. Aug 6, 2005 #5

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    And that has what to do with the question?
     
  7. Aug 7, 2005 #6
    :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

    answer : i dunno :rofl:
    marlon
     
  8. Aug 7, 2005 #7
    Sometimes it does. Such as the square of a matrix.
     
  9. Aug 7, 2005 #8

    TD

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    When we say matrix multiplication isn't commutative, we mean in general.
    To be commutative it always has to be valid.

    As you say though, there are exceptions (multiplying with the identy-matrix or with the inverse too for example) but that doesn't change the fact the multiplication isn't commutative.
     
  10. Aug 7, 2005 #9

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    MY point was that the original question had to do with rearranging the columns in one of the matrices- giving a completely different matrix. It had nothing to do with the commutativity of multiplication.

    Wandering off topic is just going to confuse the original poster.
     
  11. Aug 7, 2005 #10
    Apologises for misunderstanding the question. Glad to feel I can make mistakes and not have my gut knotted. :cry:

    The Bob (2004 ©)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Matrices question
  1. Question in matrices (Replies: 10)

  2. Matrice question (Replies: 4)

  3. Matrices Question (Replies: 9)

Loading...