- #1

- 753

- 2

Normally J_+*J_- is substituted as J^2 - J_z^2+hbarJ_z

As described above, J_+(J_-J_+), wouldn't the content in parenthesese just cancel out to 1 ?

- Thread starter Nusc
- Start date

- #1

- 753

- 2

Normally J_+*J_- is substituted as J^2 - J_z^2+hbarJ_z

As described above, J_+(J_-J_+), wouldn't the content in parenthesese just cancel out to 1 ?

- #2

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

I am going to need you to define some terms there. What is S

Normally J_+*J_- is substituted as J^2 - J_z^2+hbarJ_z

As described above, J_+(J_-J_+), wouldn't the content in parenthesese just cancel out to 1 ?

- #3

- 753

- 2

What is S_{-}, the lowering operator for spins?

Yes.

What is j? Is it the generic total angular momentum quantum number, or is it for a specific case, such as an atom, where you are considering the coupling of orbital angular momentum (l) to spin (s)?

j is the generic total ang mom

Are you dealing specifically with states of spin 1/2 particles, or is it a generic case?

Spin 1 particle

Yes.

What is j? Is it the generic total angular momentum quantum number, or is it for a specific case, such as an atom, where you are considering the coupling of orbital angular momentum (l) to spin (s)?

j is the generic total ang mom

Are you dealing specifically with states of spin 1/2 particles, or is it a generic case?

Spin 1 particle

Last edited:

- #4

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

So what happens in general when the spin lowering operator is applied to a state |j,m>? What are the properties of the scalar product of two angular momentum states?What is S_{-}, the lowering operator for spins?

Yes.

What is j? Is it the generic total angular momentum quantum number, or is it for a specific case, such as an atom, where you are considering the coupling of orbital angular momentum (l) to spin (s)?

General

Are you dealing specifically with states of spin 1/2 particles, or is it a generic case?

Spin 1 particle

Answer those questions and you will have your answer.

- #5

- 753

- 2

S_+|j,m-1> = |j,m> Is that right? Back to my question, J_+*J_- is substituted as J^2 - J_z^2+hbarJ_z which isn't 1. why is this?

<j',m'|S_+^3|j,m> = c_jm^+c_jm+1^+c_jm+2^+<j',m'|j,m+3> delta_j',j delta_m',m+3

- #6

- 753

- 2

MY secnod question is the following

S_-S_+|+-> = h^2 |-+>

Where does the eigenvalue h^2 come from?

S_-S_+|+-> = h^2 |-+>

Where does the eigenvalue h^2 come from?

- #7

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

Close, there should be a constant multiplying the state on the rhs of each equation above. But anyway, that isn't what you posted originally .. your expression from your OP has two applications of the lowering operator ...S_-|j,m>=|j,m-1>

S_+|j,m-1> = |j,m> Is that right?

just to clarify, I guess you mean:Back to my question, J_+*J_- is substituted as J^2 - J_z^2+hbarJ_z which isn't 1. why is this?

[tex]J_{+}J{-}=J^{2}-J_{z}^{2} + \hbarJ_{z}[/tex]

That is correct, but why would you think it equals one in the general case? That expression is an operator, so you should look at what it does to a state ... since any angular momentum eigenstate of each of the operators in that expression, this is pretty trivial:

[tex][J^{2}-J_{z}^{2} + \hbarJ_{z}]|j,m> = J^{2}|j,m>-J_{z}^{2}|j,m> + \hbarJ_{z}|j,m> = \hbar^{2}[j(j+1) - m^{2} + m]|j,m>[/tex]

Not sure what that last expression has to do with anything, but FWIW it looks basically correct (although it could do with some tex formatting .<j',m'|S_+^3|j,m> = c_jm^+c_jm+1^+c_jm+2^+<j',m'|j,m+3> delta_j',j delta_m',m+3

- #8

- 753

- 2

What constant are you referring to?

- #9

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

I don't really understand that ... what is |+->?MY secnod question is the following

S_-S_+|+-> = h^2 |-+>

Where does the eigenvalue h^2 come from?

In any case, hbar is the quantum mechanical unit of angular momentum. So the result of applying any angular momentum operator to a quantum state will always be multiplied by hbar. In the case above, the operator is a product of two angular momentum operators, so you get hbar*hbar from the application of that operator to a state.

- #10

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

Perhaps you should check out a website where all of this is worked out sequentially in some detail .. for example, check out: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/lectures/node72.htmlWhat constant are you referring to?

- #11

- 753

- 2

+ spin upI don't really understand that ... what is |+->?

In any case, hbar is the quantum mechanical unit of angular momentum. So the result of applying any angular momentum operator to a quantum state will always be multiplied by hbar. In the case above, the operator is a product of two angular momentum operators, so you get hbar*hbar from the application of that operator to a state.

- spin down

Do you know how S_z would act on such a state given what I said earlier?

S_-S_+|+-> = h^2 |-+>

In addition

S_+S_- |+-> = 0

S_z^-*S_z^+|+-> = ?

it supposed to be -hbar^2/4 not sure why.

- #12

- 753

- 2

And just to clarify, S_-*S_+ = 1 without constants?Close, there should be a constant multiplying the state on the rhs of each equation above. But anyway, that isn't what you posted originally .. your expression from your OP has two applications of the lowering operator ...

- #13

- 753

- 2

S_+S_- + S_-S_+ = S^2-S_z^2 but this book I found says its also equal to 1 for a spin 1/2 particle?? Why?

They also have

S_+S_z = -1/2 S_+

why is that one true?

- #14

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

No, ... you gave the correct expression for this *operator* earlier ... I showed you how to apply it to an eigenstate. It most certainly does not equal one.And just to clarify, S_-*S_+ = 1 without constants?

EDIT: However, since I now know you are talking about spin 1/2 eigenstates, I think you will find that the result of applying this to the eigenstate will give you 1, (well, actually hbar

Did you check out the website I linked?

Last edited:

- #15

SpectraCat

Science Advisor

- 1,395

- 2

Again, those are operators on the right hand side .. a spin 1/2 particle is an eigenstate of both of those operators ... plug in the state and evaluate the expression. However, it does not evaluate to one when applied to a spin 1/2 eigenstate .. work it out and see what you get. You are missing some factors of hbar in there as well.ALso:

S_+S_- + S_-S_+ = S^2-S_z^2 but this book I found says its also equal to 1 for a spin 1/2 particle?? Why?

again, missing some factors of hbar ... and that is a possible result, but not the only one.They also have

S_+S_z = -1/2 S_+

why is that one true?

- #16

- 753

- 2

Is the same true for a spin 3/2?

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 781

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 814

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 819