Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Matrix Exponential

  1. Jan 28, 2009 #1
    Let A be a square matrix nXn then exp(At) can be written as

    exp(At)=\alpha_{n-1}A^{n-1}t^{n-1} + \alpha_{n-2}A^{n-2}t^{n-2} + ... + \alpha_1At + \alpha_0 I

    where [tex]\alpha_0 , \alpha_1 , ... , \alpha_{n-1}[/tex] are functions of t.
    Let define

    [tex] r(\lambda)=\alpha_{n-1}\lambda^{n-1} + \alpha_{n-2}\lambda^{n-2} + ... + \alpha_1\lambda + \alpha_0 [/tex].

    If [tex]\lambda_i[/tex] is an eigenvalue of At with multiplicity k, then

    [tex] e^{\lambda_i }= r(\lambda_i) [/tex]
    [tex] e^{\lambda_i} = \frac{dr}{d\lambda}|_{\lambda=\lambda_i} [/tex]

    Does anyone know any reference where it gives a proof for this theorem? I only know how to prove this theorem intuitively using the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. I need a formal proof. The book (Schaum Outline Series) that I got it only state the theorem.

    This theorem will allowed me later to solve system of linear differential equations.

    Please help.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 28, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    The Cayley-Hamilton theorem is rigorous. The difficulty is that the a_i are all seies which you must show converge. Do you know the Jordon decomposition theorem?

    Jordon decomposition theorem
    Let A be a linear operator over the field C (complex numbers can be generalizes)
    The exist an invertable linear operator S (made up of the generalized eigenvectors of A) such that SA=BS where B is a direct sum of Jordan blocks.

    let ' denot inverse
    now we have reduced the problem to one on Jordon blocks
    H^n=0 so the infinite sum has all higher terms zero
  4. Jan 28, 2009 #3
    We are computing the matrix exponential in an undergraduate engineering mathematics class. As such we never came across the Jordon decomposition theorem before. No wonder I have difficulty in finding the literatures for the proof.
    Now there is a hint. I will again search the literatures or ask one of our professor of algebra.
    Thanks lurflurf.

    I will come back to this thread later, especially because I don't understand a word in the proof. :cry:
    If only someone could proved the theorem using the Cayley-Hamilton theorem !!!:smile:
  5. Jan 29, 2009 #4
    That professor of algebra is on leave. It's chinese new year holiday.

    :smile: Searching the internet, I found the proof that I wanted.

    Along the way I get in love with that jordan decomposition. :!!) Still reading.
    In fact jordan decomposition may refer to quite different concept

    The one given by lurflurf is Jordan normal form.

    I think computing matrix exponential using Jordan matrix ( ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_exponential ) is less efficient compare to that using the theorem that I had stated.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Matrix Exponential
  1. Matrix exponentials (Replies: 7)

  2. Matrix exponential (Replies: 3)