Matrix rep. of form, before and after tensoring.

  • Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date

WWGD

Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,254
1,814
Hi, everyone ,I would appreciate your help:

Say A is a torsion-free Abelian group, with basis {v_1,..,v_n} ; AFAIK , a torsion-free modules over a PID are free (after $9.99 S&H :smile:)

and we have a symmetric quadratic bilinear form

Q(a,b) : AxA-->Z , with a matrix representation

Q_ij = Q(v_i,v_j); i,j=1,..,n.

Now, we tensor A with IR over Z , i.e., A(X)IR , tensor over Z -integers, where IR

is the reals (with IR as an Abelian group , aka, Z-module, I assume;

not clear in the paper, but I assume it is tensoring of Z-modules, which would seem obvious)


Question:

How does the matrix rep. of Q(a,b) change after
the tensoring above (given that the map on A(x)IR is
now (Z-)linear and not bilinear anymore.)?

Do we just use the basis rep. of A(x)R for the
matrix, using basis {v_i(x)1; i=1,..,n} ?.
Is the matrix rep. still diagonalizable? ( the
original matrix is symmetric, so diagonalizable)

Thanks.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Matrix rep. of form, before and after tensoring." You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Matrix rep. of form, before and after tensoring.

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
0
Views
918

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top