1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Matural log

  1. Jul 28, 2008 #1
    Calcule: [tex]ln\frac{273}{263}[/tex]
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 28, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    That doesn't make any sense. What are we supposed to evaluate it to? Isn't it already given in the simplest form?
  4. Jul 28, 2008 #3
    Re: Natural log

    Is it?I'm sorry I don't quite understand this...Well,could this be the answer:


    According to the table of natural logs:[tex]ln3=1.09;ln9,1=2.2;ln10=2.3[/tex]
    So:[tex]ln= 1.1+2.2+2.3=5.6[/tex]

    Is it right?
  5. Jul 28, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    The first question to ask is, can you reduce the rational number? The quantities are not multiples of 3 or 9. Anything else possible? If not, then either use a calculator for natural logarithm of that ratio or look in tables for log_e of the numerator minus log_e of the denominator.
  6. Jul 28, 2008 #5
    So,It's correct my answer,right?
  7. Jul 28, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You still haven't made clear what the question is!

    Yes, 271= 3*91= 3*9.1*10 so ln(271)= ln(3)+ ln(9.1)+ ln(10). and, to one decimal place, ln(271)= 5.6. But what does that have to do with ln(271/263)?
  8. Jul 28, 2008 #7
    We have that [tex]ln2=0.7;ln1,3=0.26;ln10=2.3[/tex] The sum is equable to 5.56.

    At that time I was looking for for [tex]ln\frac{273}{263}[/tex],that's equal to [tex]ln273-ln263[/tex].It answer is,by a calculator,roughly 0.0373177.

    I think that's the corect way isn't it?
  9. Jul 29, 2008 #8
    Since 263/273 is only slightly larger than 1, you could use the taylor series expansion for x near 1. To the first power ln(1+a) ~ a, to the second ln(1+a) ~ a - 1/2a^2. These give results of .03802 and .03729 respectively. The correct answer is .03732.

    Or do this:
  10. Jul 29, 2008 #9


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Or just use your calculator to find "LN (273/263)". I still don't understand what the problem is. If the problem is just to find an (approximate) value, why break it into parts? Why not just do it directly- find 273/263 and then find the logarithm of that.
  11. Jul 29, 2008 #10
    Thankyou both guys,You were very helpful.I already got my question answered.Was just that simple!
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Matural log
  1. Log-log scales (Replies: 4)

  2. Log problem (Replies: 6)

  3. Log Rules (Replies: 2)

  4. Log questions (Replies: 3)

  5. Log calculation (Replies: 16)