(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am entirely frustrated with maximum and minimum problems. I have had this issue with them since I first was introduced to them and I thought I had resolved it but it keeps getting up and biting me again.

The problem is I am not even sure what I am in the habit of doing wrong, so I can't fix it. Could somebody point out what I have done ar*eways here for me so I can get over this once and for all..?

A closed box is to be made with length equal to 3 times its width. The total surface area of the box will be 30m^2. Find the dimensions that give maximum volume in the box.

[tex] 3000cm^2 = 2lw + 2hw + 2lh [/tex]

[tex] \frac {3000 - 6w^2} {8w}} = h [/tex]

[tex] V = l *w * h [/tex]

[tex] V(w) = 3w * w * \frac {3000 - 6w^2} {8w}} = \frac {9000w - 18w^3} {8}} [/tex]

[tex] V'(w) = \frac {9000 - 54w^2} {8}}[/tex]

[tex] V''(w) = \frac {- 108w} {8}} [/tex]

Now when I find the 0 value of dv/dw it is one value that can be positive or negative, naturally I disregard the negative value, but then plugging anything positive into the second derivative I will always get a negative slope, so all values >0 would return as a maximum. I can finish off the problem from there and get values.

However...

My problem is that if I work it out in units of metres by allowing 30m^2 to equal the surface area I get a value of ca 1.29 metres, and if I use cm^2 (above) as the surface area unit I get ca 12.9cm. Both work to give 30m^2 as the surface area but they are clearly not the same values yet they are working perfectly in the same equation??????

Should I have found both of these as critical points when looking for 0 in my 1st derivative? If so, how, what did I miss....

please someone help me iron out this crinkle in my understanding because as you can see I am too confused to do it myself.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Max/Min problem I'm fundamentally flawed in my understanding I think

Loading...

Similar Threads - problem fundamentally flawed | Date |
---|---|

A Maximization problem using Euler Lagrange | Feb 2, 2018 |

A Maximization Problem | Jan 31, 2018 |

I A question about Vector Analysis problems | Oct 4, 2017 |

B Square root differential problem | Jul 13, 2017 |

Fundamental therom problem | Sep 1, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**