Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maximal left ideal or not?

  1. Apr 20, 2010 #1
    Let R = Mn(F) be the ring consists of all n*n matrices over a field F and
    E = E11 + E22 + ... + En-1,n-1, where Eii is the elementary matrix (Eij is matrix whose ij th element is 1 and the others are 0) .
    I know that RE is a maximal left ideal . Let Q be an invertible matrix . Can we say that REQ is a maximal left ideal ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 20, 2010 #2
    [itex]E[/itex] is the identity element so [itex]RE=R[/itex]. [itex]MQ^{-1}Q=M[/itex], so [itex]REQ[/itex] is also [itex]R[/itex], which wouldn't normally be called a maximal ideal because the definition of maximal ideal requires a proper ideal.
     
  4. Apr 20, 2010 #3
    Notice that E is not the identity element because its nth row and nth column are zero .
     
  5. Apr 20, 2010 #4
    Sorry - totally missed that. I though there was something awry.
     
  6. Apr 20, 2010 #5
    If [itex]R[/itex] is any associative ring with [itex]1[/itex] and [itex]q\in R[/itex] has a multiplicative inverse, then [itex]\phi_q:R\rightarrow R[/itex] defined by [itex]\phi_q:r\mapsto q^{-1}rq[/itex] is a ring automorphism (with inverse [itex]\phi_{q^{-1}}[/itex]).

    If [itex]L\subset R[/itex] is a maximal left ideal, then so is [itex]q^{-1}Lq[/itex]. But then [itex]Lq=qq^{-1}Lq\subset q^{-1}Lq[/itex]. Because [itex]L[/itex] is a left ideal we have also [itex]q^{-1}Lq\subset Lq[/itex].

    Hence [itex]Lq=q^{-1}Lq[/itex] and therefore [itex]Lq[/itex] is a maximal left ideal.

    Using your assertion that [itex]RE[/itex] in your question is a maximal left ideal and that [itex]Q[/itex] is invertible, replacing [itex]L[/itex] by [itex]RE[/itex] and [itex]q[/itex] by [itex]Q[/itex] in the above gives the desired result.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook