Maximizing Strength: Choosing the Right Aluminum Tube Diameter for Marquee Poles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the design and construction of marquee poles using aluminum tubes, specifically addressing the issues of flexing under tension and the relationship between tube diameter and wall thickness in terms of strength and stiffness. Participants explore various factors affecting the structural integrity of the poles, including material properties and safety considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes previous experience with 4" aluminum tubes and seeks advice on whether a larger diameter or increased wall thickness would improve strength.
  • Another participant questions the terminology used, suggesting that the flexing may be due to compressive load rather than tensile load, and emphasizes the importance of stiffness over strength.
  • There is a discussion about the moment of inertia and its role in determining the flexural rigidity of the tubes, with a suggestion to research formulas related to beam cross sections.
  • Concerns are raised regarding safety codes and liability, particularly in relation to the construction and use of the marquee poles, with references to NFPA codes.
  • One participant mentions the potential vulnerability of aluminum to dents and the implications for safety and compliance with codes.
  • Another participant suggests that varying the moment of inertia along the length of the pole could reduce weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the terminology and concepts related to strength and stiffness, indicating some confusion. There is no consensus on the best approach to increase the poles' rigidity or on the implications of safety codes, as participants share differing perspectives on these issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider safety regulations and the properties of different aluminum alloys and shapes, as well as the potential impact of dents on structural integrity. The discussion reflects a range of technical knowledge and experience levels among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals involved in the design and construction of temporary structures, particularly those interested in the engineering aspects of using aluminum tubes for marquee poles.

Aurelius
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How tube strength changes with diameter
I'm planning on making marquee poles out of aluminium tube. I did so last year and they worked well, but they flexed slightly under tension.
To correct this flex, I want to use slightly different size of aluminum tube.

I used 4" tube, with a ¼" wall, at a length of 30'.
Will the tube be stronger with a larger diameter, or do I have to go for a larger wall thickness?

Basically, is there a way of working out
strength /diameter ratio?

Or even more basically, will it be weaker or stronger with a larger diameter tube, keeping the wall thickness the same?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:
Aurelius said:
Summary: How tube strength changes with diameter

I'm planning on making marquee poles out of aluminium tube. I did so last year and they worked well, but they flexed slightly under tension.
What's a Marquee Pole? And why would it flex under tension? Don't you mean some sort of bending stress?

Can you post pictures of your previous poles? Use the Attach files link below the Edit window to upload PDF or JPEG files. Thanks.
 
Marquee poles, or big top poles. Tent canopy pole.
I've attached an image of the poles as they're set up, ready for the tarp. They're anchored with guy lines to the top of the pole, and we use a winch to hoist the tarps up the poles.
Hope this is better information.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2563.JPG
    DSC_2563.JPG
    80.5 KB · Views: 409
Ah, thanks. That helps.

But what did you mean about flexing under tension? Do you mean they flex if the rope tensions are uneven?

Who insures the installation of these tents? What wind loading do you need to design for? Where are these tents used?

Are there other commercially-available tents like these? And what pole construction to they use?
 
by flex I mean a slight bow in the full length of the pole if the tarps are over tightened, or hoisted too high. The wind loading is 65mph. The pole construction varies from company to company, steel is one option, wood another, aluminium also. We have used aluminum because of the weight reduction.
 
Who insures these tents? Who assumes the liability if there is a failure (and especially if people get hurt)?
 
They're insured by the company I'm constructing for. Also covered by my public liability insurance.

Going a bit off topic though,

Any advice on tube diameters etc?
 
I think you mean that the poles flex under compressive load, rather than tensile load, right. Also, I think you are referring to the stiffness of the poles, not their strength. Strength usually refers to the conditions under which the material breaks.
 
Yes I agree, my terminology is not as good as it could be. I am more of a hands on person and this is all a bit technical for me, but I'm learning!
Yes, it's the flex when the poles are put under tension. And the stiffness, I guess that is what I need to increase to reduce this flex...?
 
  • #10
Aurelius said:
Yes I agree, my terminology is not as good as it could be. I am more of a hands on person and this is all a bit technical for me, but I'm learning!
Yes, it's the flex when the poles are put under tension. And the stiffness, I guess that is what I need to increase to reduce this flex...?
For a given material, the thing that determines the flexural rigidity of one of your tubes is its moment of inertia about a centerline. For a given economics, the moment of inertia should be as high as possible. The moment of inertia is a function of the tube diameter and the wall thickness. Google formulas for moment of inertia of various beam cross sections.

https://skyciv.com/tutorials/area-moment-of-inertia-equations/
 
  • #11
Be careful, you may not have as much freedom of choice as you think. In the USA, if people get hurt and if the NPFA codes are not followed, it could result in criminal charges. I'm not familiar with the corresponding code in the UK or EU.

https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=102 said:
NFPA 102

Standard for Grandstands, Folding and Telescopic Seating, Tents, and Membrane Structures
NFPA 102 provides requirements extracted from NFPA 5000 and NFPA 101 for life safety in relation to fire, storm, collapse, and crowd behavior in tents, membrane structures, and assembly seating.

I would first determine the required pole properties from the safety codes, then contact aluminum tube manufacturers and ask which products meet those requirements. Tubes not only come in different sizes and thicknesses, but also different alloys and shapes. Indeed, the manufacturer may already be familiar with tent applications like yours and have a standard recommendation. The manufacturer may also be able to advise on restrictions on drilling holes in the tube to mount stuff and advise on suitable butt plates.

A possible vulnerability of aluminum is that the soft metal could be easily dented during transport or erection. How big a dent is allowed while still meeting the codes? If you had to discard a dented pole, that might wipe out your savings.

I think yours is definitely a case where licensed professional engineers might save you money and liability.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChemAir, berkeman and Chestermiller
  • #12
Aurelius said:
They're insured by the company I'm constructing for. Also covered by my public liability insurance.

Going a bit off topic though,

Any advice on tube diameters etc?
Not really off-topic. Safety is extremely important in projects like this that involve life and potential injuries.

Do your insurance companies know that you are asking for technical engineering construction advice in anonymous Internet discussion forums?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
  • #13
Also, varying the moment of inertia from top to bottom can save on the weight of the pole.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K