Minimize Cost of Norman Window: Area Ratio of h/r

Just show any extra lines of working.You simply substitute:\frac{h}{r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}\left[\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}\right] = \frac{A}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{5\pi}{2}+2\right)}{A}-\frac{\pi}{4} = \pi +...Just show any extra lines
  • #1
fghtffyrdmns
145
0

Homework Statement


A Norman window has the shape of a rectangle with a semicircular top. Assume that the semicircular portion of the peripmeter is three times as costly to build per metre as the straight edges. For a given area, what ratio of heigh to radius would minimize the cost.

Homework Equations



A diagram. r is radius, h is height.

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]P = (\pi r)+ 2r+ h + h[/tex]

I'm not sure if this is right. It is asking for area so I should use [tex] S.A = (\pi r^2)/2 + 2rh[/tex]?

I'm just having trouble setting up the equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi fghtffyrdmns! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
fghtffyrdmns said:
A Norman window has the shape of a rectangle with a semicircular top. Assume that the semicircular portion of the peripmeter is three times as costly to build per metre as the straight edges. For a given area, what ratio of heigh to radius would minimize the cost.

πr2/2 + 2rh is correct for the area.

But when they say "as costly to build per metre", I think they mean you have to take the perimeter of the semi-circle. :wink:
 
  • #3
tiny-tim said:
Hi fghtffyrdmns! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


πr2/2 + 2rh is correct for the area.

But when they say "as costly to build per metre", I think they mean you have to take the perimeter of the semi-circle. :wink:

Would the perimieter be just [tex]\pi r[/tex]?
 
  • #4
fghtffyrdmns said:
Would the perimieter be just [tex]\pi r[/tex]?

(what happened to that π i gave you? :confused:)

Yup! :smile:
 
  • #5
tiny-tim said:
(what happened to that π i gave you? :confused:)

Yup! :smile:
So I would use[tex] P = (\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h[/tex] to create the cost function of [tex] C(r) = 3(\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h[/tex]?
 
  • #6
Moderator's note: giving complete solutions to homework problems is against our forum guidelines.

(Solution deleted.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Your answer is correct: according to the textbook. I am confused though for where the c comes from.
 
  • #8
fghtffyrdmns said:
Your answer is correct: according to the textbook. I am confused though for where the c comes from.
The problem does not specify the cost per unit length of the window, so a truly general expression for the cost would include this (unknown) parameter. kyp4 has denoted this as c.

As it turns out, the solution to this problem does not depend on the value of c. So setting up the problem as if c is 1 dollar per meter (as you did) works fine.
 
  • #9
Alright,

so I have [tex] P = (\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h [/tex] and [tex] S.A = (\pi r^2)/2 + 2rh [/tex].

From this, I can solve for h in the area function - as it asks in terms of area.

I get [tex] h =\frac{A}{2r} - \frac{\pi r}{4}[/tex]

Knowing that the perimeter of the semi circle is 3x as costly, you get [tex]C(r) = 3(\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h[/tex] Substituting h into the cost function, you get [tex] C(r) = \frac{5\pi r}{2} + 2r + \frac{A}{r}[/tex]

Now, do I determine the derivative and solve for r? After determining r, I substitute into the formula for h which then I can solve h/r?
 
  • #10
I apologize for revealing the complete solution. I am new to the forums and did not realize this was against forum policy. Makes sense though.

While setting [tex]c=1[/tex] works out, it is more proper to consider it as some arbitrary variable [tex]c[/tex] and it will disappear if it turns out not to be relevant as in this case. This will guard you against the case in which [tex]c[/tex] turns out to be crucial to solving the problem, which will become evident if you end up with the variable in your resulting equations.

That being said, the procedure you described at the end of you last post fghtffyrdmns, should lead you to the same result as I got (whose correctness I am still not certain :redface:).
 
  • #11
[tex] C(r) = \frac{5\pi r}{2} + 2r + \frac{A}{r} [/tex]

[tex] C'(r) = \frac{5\pi}{2} + 2 - \frac{A}{r^2}[/tex]

I got [tex]r = \sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}[/tex]

Should I simply this or can I sub it into the equation?

[tex] h =\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}[/tex]

Now, I do not know how to solve the h/r :/. The book comes out with [tex]{\pi}+1[/tex].

Kyp, you are correct about not putting the c=1 constant in this - however, I do not know how you did it.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Regarding the arbitrary variable [tex]c[/tex], it appears in [tex]C(r)[/tex] as a coefficient of all the terms, that is

[tex]
C(r) = \frac{5\pi cr}{2} + 2cr + \frac{Ac}{r}
[/tex]

and is canceled out when solving for [tex]r[/tex] after setting the derivative to zero, arriving at the same result you got. Try it. You've got the correct results for [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]h[/tex] and have simplified them as far as they can be simplified. Simply substitute the expressions you got above into [tex]h/r[/tex] and you'll find that the square roots cancel and combine to get you the correct result.
 
  • #13
kyp4 said:
Regarding the arbitrary variable [tex]c[/tex], it appears in [tex]C(r)[/tex] as a coefficient of all the terms, that is

[tex]
C(r) = \frac{5\pi cr}{2} + 2cr + \frac{Ac}{r}
[/tex]

and is canceled out when solving for [tex]r[/tex] after setting the derivative to zero, arriving at the same result you got. Try it. You've got the correct results for [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]h[/tex] and have simplified them as far as they can be simplified. Simply substitute the expressions you got above into [tex]h/r[/tex] and you'll find that the square roots cancel and combine to get you the correct result.

See, this is where I am having a problem.

I do not know how to solve h/r. Do I have to rationalize? Or did I make a mistake with my h value so the roots do not cancel?
 
  • #14
You simply substitute:

[tex]
\frac{h}{r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}\left[\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}\right] = \frac{A}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{5\pi}{2}+2\right)}{A}-\frac{\pi}{4} = \pi + 1
[/tex]
 
  • #15
kyp4 said:
You simply substitute:

[tex]
\frac{h}{r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}\left[\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}\right] = \frac{A}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{5\pi}{2}+2\right)}{A}-\frac{\pi}{4} = \pi + 1
[/tex]

See, how come the square roots disappear on both of them? The algebra is confusing me.

Edit: I figured it out how you get the [tex]\pi + 1[/tex] after you do the first part. It's the radicals that are confusing me, however.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Yes the radicals can make it confusing. Is it clear that

[tex]
\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}}}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}} = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}}\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} = \frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}
[/tex]

and

[tex]
\frac{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}} = 1
[/tex]

? If so, the rest should follow.
 

1. What is the "Minimize Cost of Norman Window" problem?

The "Minimize Cost of Norman Window" problem is a mathematical optimization problem that involves finding the optimal dimensions for a Norman window (a rectangular window with a semi-circular top) in order to minimize the cost of materials used.

2. How is the area ratio of h/r related to the cost of a Norman window?

The area ratio of h/r, where h is the height of the rectangular portion and r is the radius of the semi-circular top, determines the proportions of the window and therefore affects the amount of material needed. A higher area ratio means a larger rectangular portion and a smaller semi-circular top, which typically results in a lower cost.

3. How can the area ratio of h/r be optimized to minimize the cost of a Norman window?

The area ratio of h/r can be optimized by finding the value that minimizes the total cost function, which takes into account the cost of materials for both the rectangular and semi-circular portions of the window. This can be done using mathematical techniques such as calculus and linear programming.

4. Are there any other factors besides the area ratio that affect the cost of a Norman window?

Yes, there are other factors that can affect the cost of a Norman window, such as the type and quality of materials used, labor costs, and any additional features or design elements. However, the area ratio of h/r is a major factor in determining the cost of materials and is often the focus of optimization in the "Minimize Cost of Norman Window" problem.

5. What are some real-world applications of the "Minimize Cost of Norman Window" problem?

The "Minimize Cost of Norman Window" problem has applications in architecture, construction, and manufacturing industries. It can be used to optimize the design and production of windows for buildings, vehicles, and other structures, leading to cost savings and improved efficiency. This problem also has implications for environmental sustainability, as minimizing material use can reduce waste and conserve resources.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top