Maximum order of essential and natural conditions

  • Thread starter ENgez
  • Start date
  • #1
75
0
Is there a physical explanation for why when given a differential equation with spatial derivative of spatial order [itex]2m[/itex] the maximum order of the essential (displacement) boundary condition is [itex]m[/itex], and the maximum order of the natural (force) boundary condition is [itex]2m-1[/itex]

for example, the equaiton governing the dynamic behavior of a 1D bar is:
[itex] \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial x^2} = \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial t^2} [/itex]

the maximum order of the essential boundary condition is 0 :
[itex] u(0,t)=0[/itex]
and the maximal order of the natural boundary condition is 1:
[itex] EA\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(L,t)=R(t) [/itex]
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
18,378
8,249
Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Related Threads on Maximum order of essential and natural conditions

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
684
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
20K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top