Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution

  1. Sep 16, 2016 #1
    Hi, I have a question about Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution.

    First, because of mass conservataion and energy conservatioin, Sum Ni and Sum EiNi must be constant.
    Partial of both sum will be 0.

    Is that why we adopted constant alpha as a parametric constant? because without alpha, partial Nj of Sum Ni will be 1 and there must be inequality because partial Nj of Sum Ni has to be 0.


    And would that mean alpha and beta will be always 0?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 18, 2016 #2
    If you are trying to extremize some function ##S(N_1, N_2, \dots, N_n)## with respect to some constraint ##f(N_1, N_2, \dots, N_n)=0## it must be that at the extreme point the tangent space of the level set of ##S## coincides with the tangent of the constraint level set. Otherwise you could make a differential change to the ##N_i## in a direction allowed by the constraint and obtain a different value of ##S##. Thus ##S## would not be extremized.

    The statement that the level sets have the same tangent space is the same as saying the gradients of ##S## and ##f## must be proportional to one another. We call these proportionality constants Lagrange multipliers.

    In the above example there are two constraints instead of one. The constants ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are the Lagrange multipliers. ##\alpha## and ##\beta## will not always be 0.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted