Maxwell's Demon

  • Thread starter FZ+
  • Start date
FZ+
1,549
2

Main Question or Discussion Point

I'm not sure if I got the name right, but anyways...

Suppose we have a nanoscopically small, but very clever device. (and with modern technology, this sort of thing is becoming almost practical...) It is basically just two compartments, with a hole in between. Contained in the compartments, we have an energetic gas. The hole is controlled by a very clever valve mechanism, that lets particles through in one way only. We let the device run, and hey presto, by simple random motion, all of the gas is gathered in one of the compartments. At the push of a button, the hole can be used to drive a turbine from the diffusion of the gas, thus generating energy - and decreasing entropy.

Obviously, such a device would break the laws of thermodynamics. So, why exactly would it not work?
 

Answers and Replies

chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,165
34
Because this 'clever valve' can't exist.

- Warren
 
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,764
5
The demon has to find out which corpuscles are moving fast and which are not. In gaining this information he increases his entropy, and voila! calculations show that the entropy the demon gains is equal to the entropy the gas system loses by his ministrations! No contradiction. This is a well-known result in modern thermodynamics.
 
Originally posted by FZ+
I'm not sure if I got the name right, but anyways...

Suppose we have a nanoscopically small, but very clever device. (and with modern technology, this sort of thing is becoming almost practical...) It is basically just two compartments, with a hole in between. Contained in the compartments, we have an energetic gas. The hole is controlled by a very clever valve mechanism, that lets particles through in one way only. We let the device run, and hey presto, by simple random motion, all of the gas is gathered in one of the compartments. At the push of a button, the hole can be used to drive a turbine from the diffusion of the gas, thus generating energy - and decreasing entropy.

Obviously, such a device would break the laws of thermodynamics. So, why exactly would it not work?
I have not been doing anything on Thermo for much time, but I will try anyway!...

If the system is isolated, the temperature of the gas will increase, and the pressure too... If the temperature increases, the entropy will do too... Let's imagine that the gas is an ideal one (it couldn't be *good* since the system is nanoscopical, but I think we can do it to see what happen). We will have
S2-S1=cLn(T2/T1)>0 because T2>T1, so no decreasing entropy...

I bet for it...
 
Last edited:
drag
Science Advisor
1,055
0
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
The demon has to find out which corpuscles are moving fast and which are not. In gaining this information he increases his entropy, and voila! calculations show that the entropy the demon gains is equal to the entropy the gas system loses by his ministrations! No contradiction. This is a well-known result in modern thermodynamics.
Fascinating !
So all this talk about thermodynamics being violated
on tiny scales in devices like the one FZ+ talks about
here is wrong/misinterpreted by the layman in terms of
being able to use that energy ?

Live long and prosper.
 
6,171
1,275
Here are Maxwell's own original
words in setting out this train
of thought:

James Clerk Maxwell
Address:http://webserver.lemoyne.edu/faculty/giunta/demon.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
krab
Science Advisor
896
1
Interestingly, Maxwell made no speculations re the entropy gained by the demon, but only posited the argument that the 2nd law applies to large numbers of particles.

A much simpler system was proposed by Feynman, where the demon is essentially just a ratchet. A 'windmill' attached to the ratchet would allow for thermal fluctuations to apply forces of either direction to the windmill, but the ratchet would only allow motion in one direction, thus seeming to violate the 2nd law. The resolution is the fact that for the ratchet to be this sensitive, the pawl of the ratchet must be microscopic as well, and it would itself be subject to thermal fluctuations; essentially, it would bounce around, and the ratchet wouldn't work.

Recently, the above was put on a firm basis. See Phys.Rev.E 59, 6448 (1999). Link is

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9902056
 

Related Threads for: Maxwell's Demon

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
727
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
408
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
653
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
14K
Top