Maxwell's equations

Yes they are. But keep in mind that each one of maxwell's equations inevitably contains some sort of fundamental constant (mu or epsilon usually; not to mention electric charge etc etc) which are measured quantities and therein not exact.
Does that answer your question?

 

They're not exactly exact. QED makes slightly different predictions from classical electromagnetism.

 

Mathematically, correct hence exact. Physically, it's a good approximation and only an approximation to model phenomena. Hence not exact physically. Is anything exact physically? No.

 

lz, be careful.

which constant in Maxwell's equation is measured and not defined (to an exact value)?

 

Epsilon-not.

Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.

 

you mean this epsilon-not ?

 

And the http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?mu0"?

 

I have one apple, I add another one, I have exactly two apples.

 

Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?

 

Pfft, technicalities. If truth be told, the error is in disguise - it's either present in the definition(s) or as a constant in whatever expression you're using.

On the other hand, there is no match for the physics of two cows™.

You have two communist cows.

 

by the way, that's
epsilon-http://www.answers.com/naught&r=67" [Broken] (epsilon-zero) and similarly for mu-naught.

 

so, that applies, too, when two physicists get together?

 

I guess so :rofl:
edit
Actually, it depends. If they disagree on the status of "is string a theory ?", their interaction can be very exothermic.

They have gravitational biding energy, don't they ?