Hi All:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am curious about the definition of mean curvature and its apparent lack of invariance under changes of coordinates: AFAIK, mean curvature is defined as the trace of the second fundamental form II(a,b). II(a,b) is a quadratic/bilinear form, and I do not see how its trace is invariant under (local, i.e., chartwise ) change of coordinate. I assume the solution to this (apparent) problem has to see with some result in multilinear algebra; specifically with the result that ## Hom(W,W) ≈ W\otimes W^* ## , using the fact that every map ## L: W \rightarrow W## gives rise to a bilinear form ( assuming the presence of an inner-product ). Maybe we can go in the opposite direction and get the map L from the quadratic ( second fundamental) form and then compute its trace? Even if this is possible, can we guarantee that the trace of this map is independent of the (local/coordinate-wise) choice of coordinates?

P.S: Is there a way within the settings/menu of saving the work while posting? I just wasted around 20 minutes posting only to be told that I had to log in again to be able to post. I hit the back button in my computer, but all my work had been erased.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mean Curvature and Invariance.

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Mean Curvature Invariance | Date |
---|---|

I Whats the meaning of Parallel in Vectors | May 7, 2017 |

I Mean and Gaussian curvature for a Gaussian 'hill' seem wrong | Apr 14, 2017 |

I Meaning of the sign of the geodesic curvature | Nov 11, 2016 |

Integral of mean curvature function | Nov 6, 2012 |

Mean curvature | Feb 16, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**